we wonder why they have not come up w/ a better word on that IT website, a
"standard" ...maybe launching day ...or opening day .:-)
--- On Sat, 1/24/09, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> From: Hank Nussbacher
> Subject: Re: inauguration streams review
> To: "Flor
Obama inauguration sets Web traffic record, Akamai says
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/012109-obama-inauguration-web-traffic.html
-Hank
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Adam Greene:
>
>> Hi, quick question ...
>>
>> Most people here said they saw most of the inauguration traffic on
>> TCP1935 to Limelight and UDP8247 to CNN. However, we were seeing it
>> simply as "http" traffic (i.e. port 80), which made
* Adam Greene:
> Hi, quick question ...
>
> Most people here said they saw most of the inauguration traffic on
> TCP1935 to Limelight and UDP8247 to CNN. However, we were seeing it
> simply as "http" traffic (i.e. port 80), which made it very difficult
> to manage. Our inbound bandwidth was effect
Stewart"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: inauguration streams review
COWs are more or less full sites - so standard N concurrent voice
calls per carrier (check out the CDMA standard if you're really
interested), times the number of carriers. They can do 850+PC
mike.l...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 1:52 PM
> To: Jack Carrozzo
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: inauguration streams review
>
> How many simultaneous connections can each COW handle? What kind of
> backhaul
> connections do they have?
>
> -M
Just curious on that note with COW .. did you have much security related
problems setting up stuff nearby?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Lyon [mailto:mike.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 1:52 PM
To: Jack Carrozzo
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: inauguration streams
How many simultaneous connections can each COW handle? What kind of backhaul
connections do they have?
-Mike
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Jack Carrozzo wrote:
> I can't comment on revenue-generation, though access as a whole was quite
> high.
>
> We hardly had any voice IAs (Ineffective A
I can't comment on revenue-generation, though access as a whole was quite high.
We hardly had any voice IAs (Ineffective Attempts, or 'Busy'
messages). Since data can be queued, the only thing that would cause
data IAs are bad RF conditions - we had a TON of 'cell on wheels' in
the area for the ev
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Jack Carrozzo wrote:
Cell networks held up reasonably well for voice, though SMS and MMS
delivery times approached an hour during the event. Switch load in
almost the entire US was higher than midnight on New Years (which is
generally the highest load of the year).
Our netw
Cell networks held up reasonably well for voice, though SMS and MMS
delivery times approached an hour during the event. Switch load in
almost the entire US was higher than midnight on New Years (which is
generally the highest load of the year).
Our network has been preparing since June, and I assu
Better question is how well the cell systems are holding up in DC today???
But, that is slightly OT.
-Mike
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Fred Heutte wrote:
> Normally I wouldn't do this but given that it's of-the-moment...
>
> fh
>
> -
>
>
> http://www.salon.com/tec
12 matches
Mail list logo
