Jay Ashworth writes:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Jared Mauch"
>
>> network side. I'm personally not convinced of the value of very short
>> lease times (less than an hour)
>
> Less than an hour, perhaps not.
>
> On small residential networks, though -- generally, anything where th
Why not avoid controllers entirely? I recommend Aerohive. In their
solution, there is NO controller, rather the APs communicate with each
other. (Imagine what OSPF would be like with a centralized router)
Check them out
www.aerohive.com
Kindest regards,
Troy
Sent from my iPhone. Apologies for
igher densities. You
>>> really can't argue with Unifi's price.
>>>
>>> If you move up the price scale, Meraki seems to be a good midrange
>>> solution, and they have some really sweet reporting functionality. They're
>>> mor
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:55:29 PST, Jon Sevier said:
> be considered 'enterprise ready'. It's at best coffee shop ready based on
"coffee shop ready". I'll have to remember that one, thanks. ;)
pgpXrRFUaRX4v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Ken King wrote:
> I need to choose a wireless solution for a new office.
>
up to 600 devices will connect. most devices are mac books and mobile
> phones.
>
> we can see hundreds of access points in close proximity to our new office
> space.
>
> what are the th
- Original Message -
> From: "Jared Mauch"
> network side. I'm personally not convinced of the value of very short
> lease times (less than an hour)
Less than an hour, perhaps not.
On small residential networks, though -- generally, anything where the
router (which will need to get re
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Ken King wrote:
> I need to choose a wireless solution for a new office.
>
> up to 600 devices will connect. most devices are mac books and mobile
> phones.
>
> we can see hundreds of access points in close proximity to our new office
> space.
>
> what are the t
On 1/15/12 11:30 , Ken King wrote:
> I need to choose a wireless solution for a new office.
>
> up to 600 devices will connect. most devices are mac books and mobile phones.
>
> we can see hundreds of access points in close proximity to our new office
> space.
>
> what are the thoughts these d
On Jan 16, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Tim Franklin wrote:
>> As for the iOS problem, read on here:
>> http://www.net.princeton.edu/apple-ios/ios41-allows-lease-to-expire-keeps-using-IP-address.html
>
> That's the iOS issue - out of curiosity, what's the Mac issue?
That's a poorly maintained device iss
> As for the iOS problem, read on here:
> http://www.net.princeton.edu/apple-ios/ios41-allows-lease-to-expire-keeps-using-IP-address.html
That's the iOS issue - out of curiosity, what's the Mac issue?
Regards,
Tim.
00 devices /
>>> AP. Of course, if one bad client comes along (with a card that doesn't
>>> backoff its TX power, etc), it can wreak havoc with higher densities. You
>>> really can't argue with Unifi's price.
>>>
>>> If you move up th
...@anuragbhatia.com]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 4:44 PM
To: Martin Hotze
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: enterprise 802.11
(...)
You need to do a bit of site survey to get idea of how many AP's you really
need. Remember it's open spectrum and running different bands from adjacent
AP&
Hi
I personally feel more then devices what matters is topology in deployment.
I have used Cisco AP's and they are pretty much fine.
Ubnt - true used lot more for outside wifi deployment specially for point
to point (and multipoint links).
You need to do a bit of site survey to get idea of how m
Hi,
the wireless itself is not the big problem, most of your devices (Mac) will be
the problem (BTDTGNS). And my wild guess is that mobile phones will also be
mostly iphones, plus some ipads.
ZyXEL has good WLAN controllers, as does LANCOM. Both have very good products
for the money. No need -
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 21:30, Ken King wrote:
> I need to choose a wireless solution for a new office.
>
> up to 600 devices will connect. most devices are mac books and mobile phones.
>
> we can see hundreds of access points in close proximity to our new office
> space.
>
> what are the though
> Making APs as low power and "local" as possible is good advice
^ Ignoring this advice is one of the biggest mistakes people make. They think
"Oh, I'll just drown out the noise", but the problem is almost never how well
the clients can see the AP - it's the AP seeing the clients. It's hard to
On 1/15/2012 11:30 AM, Ken King wrote:
I need to choose a wireless solution for a new office.
up to 600 devices will connect. most devices are mac books and mobile phones.
we can see hundreds of access points in close proximity to our new office space.
what are the thoughts these days on the
No one has mentioned Belair yet? Serves the Minneapolis network pretty well.
http://www.belairnetworks.com/
-Original Message-
From: Greg Ihnen
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 19:06:26
To: Nathan Eisenberg
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: enterprise 802.11
Since we're already top-po
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
> Since we're already top-posting…
>
> I've heard a lot of talk on the WISPA (wireless ISP) forum that 802.11g/n
> starts to fall apart with more than 30 clients associated if they're all
> reasonably active. I believe this is a limitation of 80
I like Cisco's WLC's as well. Where I am working we have a few hundred AP's at
one of our sites with WLC's running the show. The 5500 controllers with
CleanAir AP's is awesome.
Dave
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 15, 2012, at 12:57, Mike Hale wrote:
> Cisco's wireless solutions are pretty badass.
ange solution,
>> and they have some really sweet reporting functionality. They're more
>> expensive, though.
>>
>> And then, yes, Cisco is the gold standard, but it will cost you some gold to
>> get it.
>>
>> Nathan
>>
>>> -Original Mes
; And then, yes, Cisco is the gold standard, but it will cost you some gold to
> get it.
>
> Nathan
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mike Lyon [mailto:mike.l...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 11:54 AM
>> To: Meftah Tayeb
>> Cc:
On Jan 15, 2012, at 4:44 PM, Joe Johnson wrote:
>> Meraki... ;^)
>
> Seconded!
>
I'd like to stick my neck out for Meraki also.. They rock.
-Scott
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Ken King wrote:
> I need to choose a wireless solution for a new office.
>
> up to 600 devices will connect. most devices are mac books and mobile
> phones.
>
> we can see hundreds of access points in close proximity to our new office
> space.
>
> what are the t
+1 f/Aruba ... and check out the BlackHat conferences, also.
On Jan 15, 2012 3:31 PM, "Rafael Rodriguez" wrote:
> I'd recommend Aruba. Not a fan of the Cisco wifi controller gear.
>
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Ken King wrote:
>
> > I need to choose a wireless solution for a new office.
>
> Meraki... ;^)
Seconded!
Joe Johnson
Chief Information Officer
Riverside Consulting Group, Ltd.
Innovative Technology Solutions
365 Addison Road
Riverside, Illinois 60546
Phone: 708.442.6033 x3456
Fax: 708.443.4496
j...@riversidecg.com
www.riversidecg.com
Any body tried "Proxim ORiNOCO AP-8000", I have them in two airport and
they really sucks ;)
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Ken King wrote:
> I need to choose a wireless solution for a new office.
>
> up to 600 devices will connect. most devices are mac books and mobile
> phones.
>
> we can
cisco made the controller only to buy it?
ubiquity or Mikrotik.
END!
- Original Message -
From: "Rafael Rodriguez"
To: "Ken King"
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: enterprise 802.11
I'd recommend Aruba. Not a fan of the Cisco wifi
Meraki... ;^)
http://www.meraki.com/
Ephesians 4:32 & Cheers!!!
-Original Message-
From: Ken King [mailto:kk...@yammer-inc.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 11:31 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: enterprise 802.11
I need to choose a wireless solution for a new office.
up to 600 d
I'd recommend Aruba. Not a fan of the Cisco wifi controller gear.
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Ken King wrote:
> I need to choose a wireless solution for a new office.
>
> up to 600 devices will connect. most devices are mac books and mobile
> phones.
>
> we can see hundreds of access poin
I use ruckus in town and city installs and despite rather a lot of other APs it
performs very well.
I don't have experience of them in high connected station density though.
--
Leigh Porter
On 15 Jan 2012, at 19:33, "Ken King" wrote:
> I need to choose a wireless solution for a new office.
Hi,
We chose the 3Com, now H3C wx3012 controller and AP9552 accesspoints.
Initial issues where that blackberries could not connect to the wifi, the
support initially was mediocre.
Do note that this was at the time that everything got sold to HP. And they did
pick up the issue and came around w
t reporting functionality. They're more
expensive, though.
And then, yes, Cisco is the gold standard, but it will cost you some gold to
get it.
Nathan
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Lyon [mailto:mike.l...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 11:54 AM
> To:
Cisco's wireless solutions are pretty badass. The APs I've used are
absolutely rock solid. Set up will take a bit of time, but once you're
done, maintenance is minimal.
On Jan 15, 2012 11:54 AM, "Mike Lyon" wrote:
> Ubiquity (www.ubnt.com) has their Unifi line of products. It's still
> pretty n
Ubiquity (www.ubnt.com) has their Unifi line of products. It's still
pretty new in the marketspace and this, working out the bugs. I use
their other products exclusively for outdoor wireless.
However, in the offices ive done, ive used Cisco's WLC 4402 controller
which supports 12 access points. Th
Ubiquity
or ubikity, maybe is miss spelled
Someone correct the spelling for him please
thank you
- Original Message -
From: "Ken King"
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 9:30 PM
Subject: enterprise 802.11
I need to choose a wireless solution for a new office.
up to 600 devices will
36 matches
Mail list logo
