> sounds good. who do you propose would fit the "role" of
> dogcatcher in this case, and why haven't they caught the
> stray yet after 5 years?
The police fill the dogcatcher role here, and they have
indeed caught and prosecuted the stray on the rare occasions
when ISPs have contacted the polic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> However, it makes little sense to close your gate to keep
>> the stray dogs out of your yard, if they can just come in via
>> your neighbour's gate and climb over the fences.
>
> It makes a lot of sense. Having closed your gate, and discovered
> a stray dog in your
Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> However, it makes little sense to close your gate to keep the stray
>>> dogs out of your yard, if they can just come in via your neighbour's
>>> gate and climb over the fences.
>>
>> It makes a lot of sense. Having closed your gate, a
Let me offer a what might be a better story
Joe owns a store where he buys widgets wholesale and sells them retail.
A bunch of widget companies get together and pressure the rest of the
widget companies not to sell to Joe. Joe finds a lawyer and sues them
all for anti-trust violations. Years go
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, it makes little sense to close your gate to keep
the stray dogs out of your yard, if they can just come in via
your neighbour's gate and climb over the fences.
It makes a lot of sense. Having closed your gate, and discovered
a stray dog in your back yard, yo
> However, it makes little sense to close your gate to keep
> the stray dogs out of your yard, if they can just come in via
> your neighbour's gate and climb over the fences.
It makes a lot of sense. Having closed your gate, and discovered
a stray dog in your back yard, you can call the animal
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> NANOG makes a fine archive of discoverable material in a court case
> intending to show collusion to drive folks out of business.
>
> One presumes that each ISP here has some form of AUP and rules on
> self-preservation roughly along the lines
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> NANOG makes a fine archive of discoverable material in a court case
> intending to show collusion to drive folks out of business.
> One presumes that each ISP here has some form of AUP and rules on
> self-preservation roughly along the lines of "if there is material
>
8 matches
Mail list logo
