>> Are you paying Trend for access to these? If not, you're not getting
>> any answers from them and they're not blocking anything.
>
>Do they return a canned answer that says "don't block", or do you get
>to wait for a DNS timeout?
Is there some reason you're asking random people rather than spe
i have not tested to see who catches what. not really into spam
research. just trying to reduce it for a server.
randy
dnslists = dialups.mail-abuse.org \
: rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org \
Are you paying Trend for access to these?
yes, i have an arrangement
I used to pay (not very much) but realized several years ago that after
using the Spamhaus lists, MAPS didn't catch any
On 13 Apr 2012 22:01:14 -, "John Levine" said:
> > dnslists = dialups.mail-abuse.org \
> > : rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org \
>
> Are you paying Trend for access to these? If not, you're not getting
> any answers from them and they're not blocking anything.
Do
>> dnslists = dialups.mail-abuse.org \
>> : rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org \
>
> Are you paying Trend for access to these?
yes, i have an arrangement
randy
> dnslists = dialups.mail-abuse.org \
> : rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org \
Are you paying Trend for access to these? If not, you're not getting
any answers from them and they're not blocking anything.
R's,
John
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012, Randy Bush wrote:
dropcondition = ${if isip4{$sender_host_address}}
message = blocked because $sender_host_address is \
in blacklist at $dnslist_domain: $dnslist_text
!dnslists = list.dnswl.org
dnslists
dropcondition = ${if isip4{$sender_host_address}}
message = blocked because $sender_host_address is \
in blacklist at $dnslist_domain: $dnslist_text
!dnslists = list.dnswl.org
dnslists = dialups.mail-abuse.org \
Generally when faced with SORBS related blocking, I have found it far more
effective to contact the receiving side and show them the ample Google
history about SORBS and the effect it has on their ability to receive email
their customers/employees have requested, and have them either change their
e
> Our ARIN allocation is:
>
> 67.217.144.0/20
>
> and SORBS had us listed within a larger black listed range, like the
> containing /12. It took us weeks to be removed from that range (or to
> have
> an exception added). This was probably a couple of years ago, or early
> last
> year.
Our experi
On 04/09/12 09:50 -0700, Brian Keefer wrote:
On Apr 7, 2012, at 4:41 PM, TR Shaw wrote:
As for SORBS, most competent mail admins dropped its use a long time
ago. I thought when Proofpoint took it over things would change (I
actually thought they would dump the SORBS name because of bad karma)
On Apr 7, 2012, at 19:41 , TR Shaw wrote:
> As for Yahoo, the problem will probably go away on its own over time. The
> problem with companies that are in questionable/bad financial shape is that
> they defund many activities that do not seem important but actually are.
> These, such as abuse h
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 09:50:00AM -0700, Brian Keefer wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 7, 2012, at 4:41 PM, TR Shaw wrote:
> >
> > As for SORBS, most competent mail admins dropped its use a long
> > time ago. I thought when Proofpoint took it over things would
> > change (I actually thought they would dump
On Apr 7, 2012, at 4:41 PM, TR Shaw wrote:
>
> As for SORBS, most competent mail admins dropped its use a long time ago. I
> thought when Proofpoint took it over things would change (I actually thought
> they would dump the SORBS name because of bad karma) but it hasn't happened.
Out of curio
On Apr 7, 2012, at 6:35 PM, Barry Shein wrote:
>
> Something I'm considering is just limiting the max size of an email
> from Yahoo severely, enough to say "I've changed my address from yahoo
> to ___".
>
> We get pounded day and night with multimegabyte (per each) spam emails
> from them.
Something I'm considering is just limiting the max size of an email
from Yahoo severely, enough to say "I've changed my address from yahoo
to ___".
We get pounded day and night with multimegabyte (per each) spam emails
from them.
Yahoo isn't the only one but the most frequent.
--
-
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:33:10PM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Apr 2012, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> Clearly, this is idiotic reasoning and only when others start
> blocking their IP ranges and DNS servers will they ever wake up.
But how idiotic is it? Do you have all Yahoo IP space and
On Sat, 7 Apr 2012, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
I recently had a similar run-in with another ISP unrelated to Yahoo. It
involved a phishing site on one of their customers. Countless emails to
their abuse@ email went unanswered. Then one day I bumped into their VP
who was trying to sell me somethin
Yahoo's "personnel" have long since demonstrated that (a) they couldn't
possibly care less about the spam, phishing, and other forms of abuse
that they're emanating, supporting or hosting on a systemic and chronic
basis (b) they are incapable of recognizing their own users, hosts,
and networks eve
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 7:25 AM, wrote:
> Yahoo is only a hegemony among spam havens, not a monopoly. There's still
> freelance havens out there, and they'll go away when SORBS does.
Sorbs did have a decent set of traps - and did catch a lot of spam.
The problem was atrociously poor maintenance
the yahoo item was a point all its own, unrelated to iweb's idiocy.
yahoo no longer care to receive abuse reports from anyone at all.
-Dan
On Sat, 7 Apr 2012, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
err, i dont know but yahoo hasnt yet acquired this random webhost whose
abuse you're trying to mail
On
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 07:00:52 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian said:
> err, i dont know but yahoo hasnt yet acquired this random webhost whose
> abuse you're trying to mail
> > - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
> >
> > (reason: 554 rejected due to spam content)
Right
err, i dont know but yahoo hasnt yet acquired this random webhost whose
abuse you're trying to mail
On Friday, April 6, 2012, goe...@anime.net wrote:
> The day SORBS goes away is the day ab...@yahoo.com starts functioning
> properly and yahoo starts booting spammers.
>
> The day SORBS goes away i
23 matches
Mail list logo
