On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 04:58:09AM -, John Levine wrote:
> >That's nice for you, but some of us are stuck with a corporate policy
> >that requires us to use such disclaimers, or face disciplinary actions.
>
> Not to seem unsympathetic or anything, but it's not my problem if your
> managemen
>> That's nice for you, but some of us are stuck with a corporate policy
>> that requires us to use such disclaimers, or face disciplinary actions.
>
> Not to seem unsympathetic or anything, but it's not my problem if your
> management are idiots.
>
> Sometimes when I get a message with partic
>That's nice for you, but some of us are stuck with a corporate policy
>that requires us to use such disclaimers, or face disciplinary actions.
Not to seem unsympathetic or anything, but it's not my problem if your
management are idiots.
Sometimes when I get a message with particularly obnoxio
On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 13:43:00 EDT, Rich Kulawiec said:
> I'd like to see it made list policy that anyone posting with such an
> appended threat be given exactly what they're demanding -- i.e.,
> unsubscribed immediately and permanently.
Every once in a while, I reply back and remind the person with
I'd like to see it made list policy that anyone posting with such an
appended threat be given exactly what they're demanding -- i.e.,
unsubscribed immediately and permanently.
Please see:
Stupid E-mail Disclaimers and the Stupid Users that Use Them
http://attrition.org/security/r
On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 05:40:39 -1000, Paul Graydon said:
> Which I do. But note the original complaint was not about using
> ridiculously long disclaimers on a mailing list, it was about the
> ridiculously long disclaimer, full stop.
If your corporate policy insists on huge disclaimers regarding
Girls. You're both pretty. Really. Move on.
-Hammer-
"I was a normal American nerd"
-Jack Herer
On 10/07/2011 10:40 AM, Paul Graydon wrote:
On 10/7/2011 5:30 AM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
On 10/7/11 08:26 , Paul Graydon wrote:
On 10/6/2011 8:02 PM, John Levine wrote:
DISCLAIMER:...
Wow. I was
On 10/7/2011 5:30 AM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
On 10/7/11 08:26 , Paul Graydon wrote:
On 10/6/2011 8:02 PM, John Levine wrote:
DISCLAIMER:...
Wow. I was thinking about answering the question, but now I don't dare.
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
Dumm
> Subscribe from your personal account.
+1
On 10/7/11 08:26 , Paul Graydon wrote:
> On 10/6/2011 8:02 PM, John Levine wrote:
>>> DISCLAIMER:...
>> Wow. I was thinking about answering the question, but now I don't dare.
>>
>> Regards,
>> John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
>> Dummies",
>> Please consider th
On 10/6/2011 8:02 PM, John Levine wrote:
DISCLAIMER:...
Wow. I was thinking about answering the question, but now I don't dare.
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly
PS:
Sorry if that came off harsh but per Telus business support there are no mail
admins at Telus.
-Original Message-
From: John Levine [mailto:jo...@iecc.com]
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 1:03 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Telus mail server admin
>DISCLAIMER: This communicat
>DISCLAIMER: This communication and any files transmitted with it may
>contain information that is privileged or confidential and is intended
>to be for the use of the individual (s) or entity named above. This
>material may contain confidential or personal information which may be
>subject to the
13 matches
Mail list logo
