RE: Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2

2011-03-02 Thread George Bonser
> If the ME3600X is much too expensive, it's possible your expectations > for pricing aren't realistic. > > Selective QinQ is pretty new, and tends to be found only in provider > type equipment. If you can live without that, "normal" (non selective) > QinQ is offered on most switches today. In tha

Re: Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2

2011-03-02 Thread sthaug
> > > Requirements are basically just 24/48 SFP ports, PVLAN and > > selective QinQ. > > > Most devices that fit the requirements are Layer 3, which pushes > > the cost > > > per port too high. ... > > The ME3600X might be more a more appropriate Cisco solution than the > > ME6

Re: Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2

2011-03-02 Thread Adam Armstrong
On 02/03/2011 19:19, James Brown wrote: On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Rubens Kuhl > wrote: > Requirements are basically just 24/48 SFP ports, PVLAN and selective QinQ. > Most devices that fit the requirements are Layer 3, which pushes the cost >

Re: Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2

2011-03-02 Thread James Brown
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote: > > Requirements are basically just 24/48 SFP ports, PVLAN and selective > QinQ. > > Most devices that fit the requirements are Layer 3, which pushes the cost > > per port too high. > > Cisco ME6524 has a model with 32 SFP ports (24 with 3:1 > ov

RE: Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2

2011-03-02 Thread Jensen Tyler
I would take a look at a Ciena 3940 and other models. They look to be cost effective for layer 2 deployments. -Original Message- From: Adam Armstrong [mailto:li...@memetic.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 4:20 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2 Hi

Re: Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2

2011-03-02 Thread Adam Armstrong
On 02/03/2011 18:26, Rubens Kuhl wrote: Requirements are basically just 24/48 SFP ports, PVLAN and selective QinQ. Most devices that fit the requirements are Layer 3, which pushes the cost per port too high. Cisco ME6524 has a model with 32 SFP ports (24 with 3:1 oversubscription, 8 non-oversubs

Re: Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2

2011-03-02 Thread Rubens Kuhl
> Requirements are basically just 24/48 SFP ports, PVLAN and selective QinQ. > Most devices that fit the requirements are Layer 3, which pushes the cost > per port too high. Cisco ME6524 has a model with 32 SFP ports (24 with 3:1 oversubscription, 8 non-oversubscribed) and "IP Base" IOS which has

RE: Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2

2011-03-02 Thread Mark Gauvin
Rad ETX 1002 and ETX 201A as CPE -Original Message- From: Nick Colton [mailto:ncol...@allophone.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 9:17 AM To: Adam Armstrong Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2 Adam, Have you looked at the Calix E7 platform or the

Re: Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2

2011-03-02 Thread Nick Colton
Adam, Have you looked at the Calix E7 platform or the Adtran TA5000? Both are Layer 2 only. Nick Colton Allo Communications On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Adam Armstrong wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm scouring the Internet for potential devices to use in a FTTB/FTTP > scenario. > > Requirements a