RE: Sandy seen costing telco, cable hundreds of millions of dollars

2012-11-08 Thread Vinny_Abello
ar service. -Vinny -Original Message- From: Alex Rubenstein [mailto:a...@corp.nac.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 9:39 AM To: 'na...@jima.tk'; 'nanog@nanog.org' Subject: Re: Sandy seen costing telco, cable hundreds of millions of dollars Probably ATT. Many areas of

Re: Sandy seen costing telco, cable hundreds of millions of dollars

2012-11-07 Thread Alex Rubenstein
Probably ATT. Many areas of NJ had zero service from them for days. - Original Message - From: Jima To: nanog Sent: Wed Nov 07 09:32:25 2012 Subject: RE: Sandy seen costing telco, cable hundreds of millions of dollars On Tuesday, 2012-11-06, Frank Bulk wrote: > So which wirel

RE: Sandy seen costing telco, cable hundreds of millions of dollars

2012-11-07 Thread Jima
On Tuesday, 2012-11-06, Frank Bulk wrote: > So which wireless carrier is bringing down the average to 81%? A quick skim of the article (again, http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/01/storm-sandy-telecoms-idUSL1E8M1L9Z20121101 ) makes me suspect AT&T. They're mentioned twice in other context, b

RE: Sandy seen costing telco, cable hundreds of millions of dollars

2012-11-06 Thread Frank Bulk
The U.S. Federal Communications Commission said on Thursday that about 19 percent of towers were still offline that morning down from 25 percent the day after the storm. Verizon Wireless, a venture of Verizon Communications and Vodafone Group Plc, said on Thursday that about 96 percent of their c