On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:21 AM, wrote:
> I think having a GRE tunnel for the internal routing protocol is
> unnecessary. Can you explain the reasoning behind this? I understand
> the technical issue whereby GRE will allow multicast for EIGRP, OSPF,
> etc, but why not just redistribute into BGP
il.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 11:28 AM
> To: Ingrum, Bill
> Cc: wtrib...@sterneagee.com; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Redundant Routes, BGP with MPLS provider
>
> On 8/31/12, bill.ing...@t-systems.com wrote:
>> I think having a GRE tunnel for the internal
1, 2012 11:15 AM To: Tribble, Wesley Cc:
> nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Redundant Routes, BGP with MPLS
> provider
>
> On 8/30/12, Tribble, Wesley wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am an Network Operator working in an Enterprise environment
>> with offices al
o:ler...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 11:28 AM
> > To: Ingrum, Bill
> > Cc: wtrib...@sterneagee.com; nanog@nanog.org
> > Subject: Re: Redundant Routes, BGP with MPLS provider
> >
> > On 8/31/12, bill.ing...@t-systems.com wrote:
> > > I th
Original Message-
> From: Lee [mailto:ler...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 11:28 AM
> To: Ingrum, Bill
> Cc: wtrib...@sterneagee.com; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Redundant Routes, BGP with MPLS provider
>
> On 8/31/12, bill.ing...@t-systems.com wrote:
> &g
I work for an MPLS provider, so I guess I tend to trust them ;)
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Lee [mailto:ler...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 11:28 AM
To: Ingrum, Bill
Cc: wtrib...@sterneagee.com; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Redundant Routes, BGP with MPLS provider
On 8/31
com]
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 11:15 AM
> To: Tribble, Wesley
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Redundant Routes, BGP with MPLS provider
>
> On 8/30/12, Tribble, Wesley wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am an Network Operator working in an Enterprise environment
@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Redundant Routes, BGP with MPLS provider
On 8/30/12, Tribble, Wesley wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am an Network Operator working in an Enterprise environment with
> offices all over the country(mostly connected via MPLS). We are
> currently working towards buil
On 8/30/12, Tribble, Wesley wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am an Network Operator working in an Enterprise environment with offices
> all over the country(mostly connected via MPLS). We are currently working
> towards building a Disaster Recovery Site that will host some of our vendor
> routers and pr
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Tribble, Wesley
wrote:
> What is the best method to Instruct the provider's
>network to prefer the Primary Data Center routes
>over the DR site? Keep in mind that I am only
>peering with the provider over BGP and I have no
>visibility to the underlying MPLS archit
as far as the server farm going down (but the router still up).
Something to think about.
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Morrow"
To: "Wesley Tribble"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 7:05:17 AM
Subject: Re: Redundant Routes, BGP wi
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Tribble, Wesley
wrote:
> -Prepend the routes from the DR site so that they will have a longer AS-path
> than the Primary location
yes
12 matches
Mail list logo
