Re: One FCC neutrality elephant: disabilities compliance

2015-02-28 Thread Lamar Owen
On 02/27/2015 03:12 PM, Mel Beckman wrote: Two pages? Read the news, man. I'd rather read the actual regulations, from the source, in 47CFR§8. They're public. The enforcement won't come from what the news said. You say you haven't read the actual R&O. Nobody in the public sector, or even

RE: One FCC neutrality elephant: disabilities compliance

2015-02-27 Thread Curtis L. Parish
27, 2015 2:35 PM To: Mel Beckman Cc: Subject: Re: One FCC neutrality elephant: disabilities compliance On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 20:12:21 +, Mel Beckman said: > Two pages? Read the news, man. It's been widely reported that the > actual Order runs to over 300 pages! It was also "

Re: One FCC neutrality elephant: disabilities compliance

2015-02-27 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 20:12:21 +, Mel Beckman said: > Two pages? Read the news, man. It's been widely reported that the actual > Order runs to over 300 pages! It was also "widely reported" that the Affordable Care Act was 20,000 pages, when in fact it was about 1,900. pgp4vEsJYoKjH.pgp Desc

Re: One FCC neutrality elephant: disabilities compliance

2015-02-27 Thread Mel Beckman
Lamar, Two pages? Read the news, man. It's been widely reported that the actual Order runs to over 300 pages! http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2015/02/26/389259382 You say you haven't read the actual R&O. Nobody in the public sector, or even in Congress AFAIK, has read it. The Order's 300-

Re: One FCC neutrality elephant: disabilities compliance

2015-02-27 Thread Lamar Owen
On 02/27/2015 01:06 PM, Mel Beckman wrote: Section 255 of Title II applies to Internet providers now, as does section 225 of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). These regulations are found in 47CFR§6, not 47CFR§8, which is the subject of docket 14-28. Not having read the actual R&O in