Cameron Byrne allegedly wrote on 10/10/2010 15:38 EDT:
> LTE provides some latency benefits on the wireless interface, but the
> actual packet core architecture is very similar to GSM / UMTS.
and it's going to be a long time before Local Breakout gets noticeably
deployed.
On 10/10/10 12:38 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>> On 10/9/10 5:08 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
>> LTE provides an opportunity to move the bottleneck.
>>
>
> LTE provides some latency benefits on the wireless interface, but the
> actual packet core a
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> On 10/9/10 5:08 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
>> I have been working on a similar project and I am finding it very hard
>> to get the mobile operators to understand why we want as little latency
>> as possible and they are not very open to people
tleneck.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Holmes,David A [mailto:dhol...@mwdh2o.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 9:42 PM
> To: Seth Mattinen; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: RE: Mobile Operator Connectivity
>
> Some large telcos with wireless and wireline operations i
Re: Mobile Operator Connectivity
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Jared Geiger
wrote:
> I would suggest getting on the GRX network. As an enterprise you
> should be able to get IPX service from any number of providers.
> Belgacom, Syniverse, and Sybase365 all offer IP data service ont
I think the service Equinix hosts is for data roaming
-Original Message-
From: Leo Woltz [mailto:leo.wo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 2:16 PM
To: Jared Geiger
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Mobile Operator Connectivity
Hi Jared
Is this different then the service at
What is the IPX service?
-Original Message-
From: Jared Geiger [mailto:ja...@compuwizz.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 9:58 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Mobile Operator Connectivity
I would suggest getting on the GRX network. As an enterprise you should
be able to get IPX
alls going wireless.
-Original Message-
From: Holmes,David A [mailto:dhol...@mwdh2o.com]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 9:42 PM
To: Seth Mattinen; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Mobile Operator Connectivity
Some large telcos with wireless and wireline operations in the US
maintain 2 separate
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Jared Geiger wrote:
> I would suggest getting on the GRX network. As an enterprise you
> should be able to get IPX service from any number of providers.
> Belgacom, Syniverse, and Sybase365 all offer IP data service onto the
> GRX. Then you aren't limited to just t
Hi Jared
Is this different then the service at Equinix?
Leo
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Jared Geiger wrote:
> I would suggest getting on the GRX network. As an enterprise you
> should be able to get IPX service from any number of providers.
> Belgacom, Syniverse, and Sybase365 all offer I
I would suggest getting on the GRX network. As an enterprise you
should be able to get IPX service from any number of providers.
Belgacom, Syniverse, and Sybase365 all offer IP data service onto the
GRX. Then you aren't limited to just the US carriers, you'll be able
to reach most all carriers glob
al LA colo, GSM/CDMA access-layer traffic
must traverse the continental US to northern Virginia and back to get to
the server.
-Original Message-
From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:se...@rollernet.us]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 1:14 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Mobile Operator C
On 9/25/2010 13:37, Leo Woltz wrote:
> I am looking for some guidance from the list. We will soon be deploying
> wireless payment devices (CDMA/GSM). We are looking at options on where to
> locate the servers that will run the backend payment gateways; we would like
> the least amount of latency
With the assumption that you will have a wired backhaul to your HQ over
which the retail access-layer devices connect to commerce servers, make
sure that the wireless carrier's gateways to their wired network (where
the wired backhaul is connected to) are geographically well-dispersed
such that wir
14 matches
Mail list logo
