> FreeBSD has supported polling for a long time (V6?) and interrupt
> coalescing since some release of V7. (Latest release is V8.)
exactly. and they kick ass
randy
Jack Carrozzo wrote:
> Lots of people roll FreeBSD with Quagga/pf/ipfw for dual stack. See
> the freebsd-isp list.
Raises hand. I do, on these boxes:
http://www.mikrotikrouter.net/
Steve
Also IIRC you can tune the hash cache / tree algorithm - ie if your
traffic is mostly a few addresses then the default prefix search is
fine (with the caching) but for more sparse traffic as you'd see at an
edge, disabling the cache and using the other algo proved a lot
faster. There's a paper on t
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 03:46:13PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Polling is excellent for low speed lines, but for Gig and faster, most
> newer interfaces support interrupt coalescing. This easily resolves the
> issue in hardware as interrupts are only issued when needed but limited
> to a reasonab
> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:20:13 -0500
> From: Chuck Anderson
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 04:12:03PM -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 13:05 -0500, Jack Carrozzo wrote:
> > > Lots of people roll FreeBSD with Quagga/pf/ipfw for dual stack. See
> > > the freebsd-isp list.
> >
William Pitcock wrote:
> FreeBSD's network stack chokes up in DDoS attacks due to interrupt
> flooding. We used to use FreeBSD for firewalling and basic routing, but
> when noticing that we had horizontal scalability (e.g. a Celeron 667mhz
> performed nearly as well as a dual dual-core Xeon syste
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 04:12:03PM -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 13:05 -0500, Jack Carrozzo wrote:
> > Lots of people roll FreeBSD with Quagga/pf/ipfw for dual stack. See
> > the freebsd-isp list.
>
> FreeBSD's network stack chokes up in DDoS attacks due to interrupt
> floo
Hi,
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 13:05 -0500, Jack Carrozzo wrote:
> Lots of people roll FreeBSD with Quagga/pf/ipfw for dual stack. See
> the freebsd-isp list.
FreeBSD's network stack chokes up in DDoS attacks due to interrupt
flooding. We used to use FreeBSD for firewalling and basic routing, but
whe
Lots of people roll FreeBSD with Quagga/pf/ipfw for dual stack. See
the freebsd-isp list.
-Jack Carrozzo
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:23 AM, William Pitcock
wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 17:12 -0700, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
>> Anyone have some insight on a good dual stack Linux (or BSD) router distr
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 17:12 -0700, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
> Anyone have some insight on a good dual stack Linux (or BSD) router distro?
> Currently using IPCop but it lacks ipv6 support. I've used SmoothWall
> Express but not in some time and not sure how well it works with IPv6. Not
> looking
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Bryan Irvine wrote:
> would pfsense work for you?
pfSense has ipv6, since it's essentially just a freebsd kernel with a
layer on top. However, ipv6 support in the GUI is fairly minimal to
non-existant, and I wouldn't recommend it if you really want to use
ipv6.
Mind you, I'm
@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Linux Router distro's with dual stack capability
Have you checked Vyatta?
HTH,
Carlos.
Have you checked Vyatta?
HTH,
Carlos.
On 2010-02-10 at 17:12:28 -0700, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
> Anyone have some insight on a good dual stack Linux (or BSD) router distro?
> Currently using IPCop but it lacks ipv6 support. I've used SmoothWall
> Express but not in some time and not sure how well it works with IPv6. Not
> looking f
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
> Anyone have some insight on a good dual stack Linux (or BSD) router distro?
Mikrotik RouterOS. It is based on Linux and a bit more feature-rich
than some of the linux router distros I've tried such as IPCop.
Licenses costs a few bucks but
rom: Bryan Irvine
To: Blake Pfankuch
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Linux Router distro's with dual stack capability
Sent: Feb 10, 2010 16:17
would pfsense work for you?
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
> Anyone have some insight on a good dual stack Linux (or
>Anyone have some insight on a good dual stack Linux (or BSD) router distro?
Currently using IPCop but it lacks ipv6 >support. I've used SmoothWall
Express but not in some time and not sure how well it works with IPv6. Not
looking for >something huge, just something for the equivalent of a small
would pfsense work for you?
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
> Anyone have some insight on a good dual stack Linux (or BSD) router distro?
> Currently using IPCop but it lacks ipv6 support. I've used SmoothWall
> Express but not in some time and not sure how well it wo
18 matches
Mail list logo
