On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:50 AM, John Kristoff wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 08:27:14 -0400
> Rob Seastrom wrote:
>
>> John's statement was in the context of general advice to be included
>> in a BCOP document and I felt compelled to say "whoa there".
ok, that was my reaction as well.
> My inten
Other phrases can be substituted.
"no guts, no glory"
"go big or go home"
"no pain, no pain"
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Scott Weeks
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 1:41 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject
On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 08:27:14 -0400
Rob Seastrom wrote:
> John's statement was in the context of general advice to be included
> in a BCOP document and I felt compelled to say "whoa there".
My intent was for it to be taken as a DDoS mitigation response option,
not as a general practice.
John
Christopher Morrow writes:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:27 AM, Rob Seastrom wrote:
>>
>> John Kristoff writes:
>>
>>> If the attack is an infrastructure attack, say a routing interface that
>>> wouldn't normally receive or emit traffic from its assigned address
>>> except perhaps for network co
--
> measures". I volunteer to write the article on "YOLO upgrades",
> wherein one loads untested software on equipment with no OOB, types
> "request system reboot", shouts "YOLO", and hits return.
:: YOLO
-
If a manager forces me to do
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:27 AM, Rob Seastrom wrote:
>
> John Kristoff writes:
>
>> If the attack is an infrastructure attack, say a routing interface that
>> wouldn't normally receive or emit traffic from its assigned address
>> except perhaps for network connectivity testing (e.g. traceroute) o
On 3/24/15 5:27 AM, Rob Seastrom wrote:
John Kristoff writes:
If the attack is an infrastructure attack, say a routing interface that
wouldn't normally receive or emit traffic from its assigned address
except perhaps for network connectivity testing (e.g. traceroute) or
control link local co
John Kristoff writes:
> If the attack is an infrastructure attack, say a routing interface that
> wouldn't normally receive or emit traffic from its assigned address
> except perhaps for network connectivity testing (e.g. traceroute) or
> control link local control traffic (e.g. local SPF adjace
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 19:00:14 -0400
Yardiel D.Fuentes wrote:
> Since there have been good feedback for this BCOP. The committee
> decided to extend the "last-call period" for another two weeks to
> give ample chance to further feedback.
>
> So, it is not late for more comments,
Hi Yardiel,
Nice
Thank you all who have contributed your feedback, comments and discussion
points towards the DDoS/DoS attack BCOP.
I have updated the current version of the BCOP with the agreed upon feedback:
http://bcop.nanog.org/index.php/BCOP_Drafts
Since there have been good feedback for this BCOP. The co
10 matches
Mail list logo
