Foul language is frowned upon.
https://www.nanog.org/list
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of James Bensley
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 4:24 AM
To: nanog
Subject: Re: IX in Iran by TIC
On 12 July 2016 at 14:36, Bevan Slattery wrote
On 12 July 2016 at 14:36, Bevan Slattery wrote:
> EXAMPLE 1.
> There maybe for example an enterprise that is looking for a service
> provider in a facility (XYZ in NY for example) but that provider actually
> "peers" their transit routers at the ABC facility down the street. Because
> the provid
On 12 July 2016 at 14:36, Bevan Slattery wrote:
> EXAMPLE 1.
> There maybe for example an enterprise that is looking for a service
> provider in a facility (XYZ in NY for example) but that provider actually
> "peers" their transit routers at the ABC facility down the street. Because
> the provid
Yes Scott. It was on topic and genuine in the approach, but understand the
nuances around it. I did declare the interest in the second email when a more
detailed explainer was included with a request to take it offline. That felt
like I was stepping over the mark for the sake of pointing out t
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016, Scott Weeks wrote:
--
Might be worthwhile to also look at throwing your
fabric/IX on X www.xx.com .
--
https://www.nanog.org/list
"5.Product marketing is prohibited"
It appears from
--
> Might be worthwhile to also look at throwing your
fabric/IX on X www.xx.com .
--
https://www.nanog.org/list
"5.Product marketing is prohibited"
It appears from a web search that you are affiliated
On 12/Jul/16 17:21, Niels Bakker wrote:
>
>
> Having recently asked a datacenter about what providers were present
> in their facilities and receiving an answer similar to "Who would you
> like to be there?", I much prefer PeeringDB's model of ensuring data
> completeness and correctness.
Aww
* be...@slattery.net.au (Bevan Slattery) [Tue 12 Jul 2016, 15:33 CEST]:
Peeringdb provides a list of registered peers in a DC that has an IX.
Great for looking at where to peer.
PeeringDB lists many datacenters without any IXP. The difference
seems to be that PeeringDB data is provided by the
Hi James,
I hear you. Massive fan of peeringdb and this isn't about replacing that
(in fact love to simply integrate).
Peeringdb provides a list of registered peers in a DC that has an IX.
Great for looking at where to peer.
Cloud Scene looks at all providers (4,000+) whether they are peering o
Hi James,
I hear you. Massive fan of peeringdb and this isn't about replacing that.
Peeringdb provides a list of registered peers in a DC that has an IX.
Great for looking at where to peer.
Cloud Scene looks at all providers (4,000+) whether they are peering or not
in any DC (4,800+ DC's) whet
On 12 July 2016 at 13:46, Bevan Slattery wrote:
> Great work. Might be worthwhile to also look at throwing your fabric/IX on
> Cloud Scene www.cloudscene.com . Provides visibility for people looking
> for DC's, providers and fabrics that just aren't limited to IX locations or
> peers.
>
> Cheers
Great work. Might be worthwhile to also look at throwing your fabric/IX on
Cloud Scene www.cloudscene.com . Provides visibility for people looking
for DC's, providers and fabrics that just aren't limited to IX locations or
peers.
Cheers
[b]
On 28 June 2016 at 18:49, Marty Strong via NANOG wro
Can’t agree more about putting your IXPs on PeeringDB, it’s my first port of
call when looking at locations to expand to.
Also, I would say to add the data centres too, to give a better idea of where
the IXPs are physically located.
Regards,
Marty Strong
--
C
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Shahab Vahabzadeh
wrote:
> Hello Everybody,
> I am here to announce that TIC in Iran launched Neutral Internet Exchange
> Points.
> Right now we have four in:
>
>- Tehran (tehran-ix.ir)
>- Shiraz (shiraz-ix.ir)
>- Tabriz (tabriz-ix.ir)
>- Mashhad (m
14 matches
Mail list logo
