On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 4:48 AM Lee Howard wrote:
>
> Depending on the capability of the exporter, you don't need to export full
flow information. With Cisco's Flexible Netflow you can define the
aggregation in the flow cache you are monitoring. You are not required to
use a 7-tuple.
An aggregati
company.
It’s definitely on our internal roadmap, though.
From: Michael Krygeris [mailto:m...@krygerism.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 9:35 AM
To: Lee Howard ; Luke Guillory ;
Sean Pedersen ; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: ISP billing - data collection, correlation, and billing
On
Hi, we use the same approach as you. When provisioning services they’re
identified by a label in the interface description so data is collected and
delivered to our billing systems.
Gerardo
El 14/07/17 13:43, "NANOG en nombre de Sean Pedersen" escribió:
I went back a few years in the arch
To be honest we don't do usage billing so I've never used it. I'd like to think
it is since it uses a verification between the collector and source.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 15, 2017, at 3:47 AM, Lee Howard
mailto:l...@asgard.org>> wrote:
On 7/14/17, 2:47 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Luke Gu
On 7/14/17, 2:47 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Luke Guillory"
wrote:
>On the HFC / CMTS side of things we have IPDR which I believe has some
>open source collectors out there. I'm not sure that IPDR is used much
>outside of the HFC world though.
IPDR was my first thought as an alternative to SNMP.
On the HFC / CMTS side of things we have IPDR which I believe has some open
source collectors out there. I'm not sure that IPDR is used much outside of the
HFC world though.
Luke Guillory
Vice President – Technology and Innovation
Tel:985.536.1212
Fax:985.536.0300
Email: lguill..
6 matches
Mail list logo
