On 18 Oct 2023, at 19:49, Adam Thompson wrote:
Sightline *Insight* is the piece the sales team won't sell me, and TAC won't
support me, for deployment in our private-cloud environment
Insight isn’t used for first-order DDoS
detection/classification/traceback/mitigation; Sightline/TMS provide
on behalf of
> Dobbins, Roland via NANOG
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 9:34:21 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: FastNetMon Usage in the wild
>
>
> On 11 Oct 2023, at 01:50, Adam Thompson wrote:
>
> you need to buy a moderately-expensive hardware server (they do
s=athomp...@merlin.mb.ca>
From: NANOG on behalf of
Dobbins, Roland via NANOG
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 9:34:21 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: FastNetMon Usage in the wild
On 11 Oct 2023, at 01:50, Adam Thompson wrote:
you need to buy a moderatel
On 10/11/23 04:34, Dobbins, Roland via NANOG wrote:
To clarify, Sightline has supported virtualization for many years, FYI.
It does do, yes. But pricing for the software license is not too far off
from if you chose to buy Netscout's own hardware.
Not a major drama for me - I appreciate t
On 11 Oct 2023, at 01:50, Adam Thompson wrote:
you need to buy a moderately-expensive hardware server (they don’t let you
virtualize it)
To clarify, Sightline has supported virtualization for many years, FYI.
I’m not aware of any anti-DDoS products at ISP scale that aren’t SFlow +
Flowspec,
We use Arbor’s Sightline in an SFlow + Flowspec topology. It… works. It needs
a lot of tuning. It’s moderately expensive to deploy in this topology, unlike
in-band which is holy-cow-expensive at our speeds. If you want
historical/forensic data, you need to buy a moderately-expensive hardware
6 matches
Mail list logo
