Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed

2011-05-08 Thread George Herbert
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Support wrote: > Can anyone give me their recommendation for current hardware to take 2 x > full BGP feeds over 1Gb/s ports with a third Gb port for the local network? > > I did this about 6/7 years ago with a Cisco 7200VXR NPE300 256MB RAM > but I'm guessing things

Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed

2011-05-08 Thread Brandon Ross
On Sun, 8 May 2011, Brent Jones wrote: Juniper is also making small enterprise routers based on the MX80 platform, but with reduced number of interfaces. They should be out soon They are effectively already out in that they have a deep discount on "restricted" bundles. Basically the bundles

Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed

2011-05-08 Thread Brent Jones
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Support wrote: > Can anyone give me their recommendation for current hardware to take 2 x > full BGP feeds over 1Gb/s ports with a third Gb port for the local network? > > I did this about 6/7 years ago with a Cisco 7200VXR NPE300 256MB RAM > but I'm guessing things

RE: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed

2011-05-07 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Sat, 7 May 2011, George Bonser wrote: Things are about to get very different very quickly. Assuming by full BGP feed you mean both IPv4 and IPv6, you are soon going to need something that takes >500,000 routes. There are two reasons for this. First as the larger blocks of v4 space become un

RE: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed

2011-05-07 Thread George Bonser
> > Can anyone give me their recommendation for current hardware to take 2 > x > full BGP feeds over 1Gb/s ports with a third Gb port for the local > network? > > I did this about 6/7 years ago with a Cisco 7200VXR NPE300 256MB RAM > but I'm guessing things have moved on??? > > Thanks, > Chris

Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed

2011-05-07 Thread Support
On 7 May 2011 at 11:02, Jon Lewis wrote: > On Sat, 7 May 2011, Support wrote: > > > Can anyone give me their recommendation for current hardware to take 2 x > > full BGP feeds over 1Gb/s ports with a third Gb port for the local network? > > > > I did this about 6/7 years ago with a Cisco 7200VXR

Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed

2011-05-07 Thread Jon Lewis
On Sat, 7 May 2011, Support wrote: Can anyone give me their recommendation for current hardware to take 2 x full BGP feeds over 1Gb/s ports with a third Gb port for the local network? I did this about 6/7 years ago with a Cisco 7200VXR NPE300 256MB RAM but I'm guessing things have moved on???

Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed

2011-05-07 Thread Bill Blackford
>> 2 x >> full BGP feeds over 1Gb/s ports with a third Gb port for the local >> network? > For new hardware, I would look at the Juniper M or MX series (depending on > your needs) or, if you are wanting Cisco, the ASR series is what to look for. > The Juniper routers are going to be less expensi

Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed

2011-05-07 Thread Randy Carpenter
I do it currently with Cisco 2821 routers with 1 GB of RAM, so it doesn't take all that much for just the BGP. It all depends on the throughput. I have sites that have 7200VXR routers with NPE-G2 and 2GB of RAM that handle 2x 1 Gig feeds, albeit not fully loaded. For new hardware, I would look

Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed

2011-05-07 Thread Raphael MAUNIER
A simple M7i can handle this. But this will depend on the type of trafic ( pps, filtering or not, ... ) regards, -- Raphaël Maunier NEO TELECOMS CTO / Responsable Ingénierie AS8218 On May 7, 2011, at 3:49 PM, Support wrote: > Can anyone give me their recommendation for current hardware to take