³Paul²,
I don¹t read this list often, and rarely have seen a private message
reposted as you did, but at the risk of DFTT, give me some time to think
through a discussion topic for this list which touches on some of these
issues.
- Kevin
DISCLOSURE: On DSLR, I am ccneteng when I visit th
Kevin,
Thank you for the info. Can you say how many quarters or years until
Comcast is resolved?
I've seen references to that obscure whitepaper (co-authored,
ironically, by Patrick Gilmore) before on the broadbandreports forums,
by someone with a lot of knowledge on Comcast's network and intern
The people pushing this policy are not without a face and name. They read
this mailing list, and attend our conferences. You'll want to talk to John
Schanz, Kevin McElearney, and Barry Tishgart.
Drive Slow (like a Comcast peering port),
Paul Wall
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Scott Berkman
Comcast having saturated links to other providers is a common and
frequently discussed issue. Here is one previous NANOG thread on the topic:
http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2010-December/029251.html
And a related article:
http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Claims-Resurface-Concerning
I'm seeing the same as well. Can anyone from Comcast/Level(3) reach out to me
or provide comment. We're seeing heavy jitter and some packet loss most
noticeable in NYC area connections between Level(3) and Comcast.
-Rob
> Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 09:45:00 -0800
> Subject: Comcast/Level3 issues
> F
5 matches
Mail list logo
