t: Re: Cogent revisited
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, James Bensley wrote:
> Perhaps that depends on were are you in the world and your traffic types.
>
> I have worked with two UK ISPs that have Cogent as one of their
> transit providers, neither have had any problems in the 5+ years
>
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, James Bensley wrote:
Perhaps that depends on were are you in the world and your traffic types.
I have worked with two UK ISPs that have Cogent as one of their
transit providers, neither have had any problems in the 5+ years
they've both had the Cogent transit, it has always
On 11 August 2015 at 21:47, Adam Greene wrote:
Perhaps that depends on were are you in the world and your traffic types.
I have worked with two UK ISPs that have Cogent as one of their
transit providers, neither have had any problems in the 5+ years
they've both had the Cogent transit, it has al
On 11/Aug/15 16:00, Adam Greene wrote:
>
>
> Have opinions changed since then? Or is Cogent still the "budget alternative
> to have in your mix, but better to stay away from if you need
> high-performance, reliable, mostly standalone bandwidth" (which is how I
> would summarize the consensus in
Thank you to those who replied off-list, for the helpful replies!
The feedback basically ranged from neutral (maybe a little positive) to really
negative. The main emphasis being on: use them only if you are redundant.
Seems like things haven’t changed much since 2012.
Thanks!
On
5 matches
Mail list logo
