RE: Cisco ISE

2017-10-07 Thread Mann, Jason
PXGrid into InfoBlox, NetScout, F5, APIC-EM, and Cisco Prime 3.1 -Original Message- From: Rheams, Doug [mailto:doug.rhe...@franklintempleton.com] Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 3:01 PM To: Christopher J. Wolff ; Mann, Jason Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Cisco ISE We started at

Re: Cisco ISE

2017-10-06 Thread Scott Morris
: Friday, October 6, 2017 at 10:09 PM To: "Christopher J. Wolff" , "nanog@nanog.org" Subject: Re: Cisco ISE On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 20:41 +, Christopher J. Wolff wrote: > Is anyone successfully deploying ISE 2.X? I’m six months into it on > about 10,000 e

Re: Cisco ISE

2017-10-06 Thread Smoot Carl-Mitchell
On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 20:41 +, Christopher J. Wolff wrote: > Is anyone successfully deploying ISE 2.X?  I’m six months into it on > about 10,000 endpoints and it seems like it’s a highly challenged > product.  I’d love to hear your experiences on or off-list.  Thanks > in advance. ISE is chall

Re: Cisco ISE

2017-10-06 Thread Darin Herteen
f me... From: NANOG on behalf of Christopher J. Wolff Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 3:53 PM To: Mann, Jason Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Cisco ISE Proceed with extreme caution. You may want to have that end of life ACS deployment bake for another six months. You will wan

Re: Cisco ISE

2017-10-06 Thread Christopher J. Wolff
Proceed with extreme caution. You may want to have that end of life ACS deployment bake for another six months. You will want to have the highest level of Cisco engineering engaged should you choose to go this direction. On Oct 6, 2017, at 3:48 PM, Mann, Jason mailto:jam...@mt.gov>> wrote: A

RE: Cisco ISE

2017-10-06 Thread Mann, Jason
As would I. We are going to start a project that is replacing ACS 5.7 with ISE 2.X -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Christopher J. Wolff Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 2:41 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Cisco ISE Is anyone successfully deployi