Thanks for all your suggestions on this topic. For what it's worth, I
attempted a few of the suggestions as well as my own idea and documented the
outcomes here:
http://www.anchor.com.au/blog/2009/05/testing-your-connectivity/
In summary, there's no definitive method for testing your connectivity
James Hess writes:
>> 29/256 = 11% of the available address space. My argument is, if
>> someone is scanning you from random source addresses blocking 10%
>> of the scan traffic is reaching a point of very little return for
>> the effort of updating the address lists, and as we all know it is
>
On Fri, 8 May 2009, Steve Bertrand wrote:
IMHO, if a network doesn't either update filters based on IANA
notifications or follow Cymru BOGON, then they don't deserve to receive
traffic from your network ;)
See how far you get telling customers that after you've given them
recently debogonized
Oliver Hookins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my company has just been allocated some new IPv4 address space, and I want
> to do some sort of automated testing to find out any ASs out there that
> haven't removed the /8 it's on from their bogon list (the allocation to our
> local registry only occurred in Novem
> 29/256 = 11% of the available address space. My argument is, if
> someone is scanning you from random source addresses blocking 10%
> of the scan traffic is reaching a point of very little return for
> the effort of updating the address lists, and as we all know it is
> getting smaller and small
nk
-Original Message-
From: Steve Dalberg [mailto:steve+na...@sendithere.com]
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 9:45 AM
To: Oliver Hookins
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Checking bogon status of new address space
Having recently received some de-bogon'ed addressing in or about this Marc
29/256 = 11% of the available address space. My argument is, if
someone is scanning you from random source addresses blocking 10%
of the scan traffic is reaching a point of very little return for
the effort of updating the address lists, and as we all know it is
getting smaller and smaller.
Tr
In a message written on Fri, May 08, 2009 at 12:27:29PM -0500, Rob Thomas wrote:
> This is the primary reason we removed the static bogon lists from our
> Secure [BIND|IOS|BGP] Templates. My thanks to Randy Bush (and a few
> other folks) for the suggestion.
I want to thank Team Cymru for their ef
Hi, Steve.
> Having recently received some de-bogon'ed addressing in or about this March,
> I can tell you that the one problem I had was people that had not updated
> their Bind Bogon filters (
> http://www.cymru.com/Documents/secure-bind-template.html) ...
This is the primary reason we removed
Having recently received some de-bogon'ed addressing in or about this March,
I can tell you that the one problem I had was people that had not updated
their Bind Bogon filters (
http://www.cymru.com/Documents/secure-bind-template.html) and so were not
responding to requests from our address space,
Hi,
Yes, we do this for all new /8 issued to RIR's. You can find the details here:
http://www.ris.ripe.net/debogon/
Regards,
Wolfgang
Marco Hogewoning wrote:
On May 8, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
Please set up a pingable IP address for each new netblock and post it to
NANOG with a r
On Fri, 8 May 2009, Oliver Hookins wrote:
my company has just been allocated some new IPv4 address space, and I want
to do some sort of automated testing to find out any ASs out there that
haven't removed the /8 it's on from their bogon list (the allocation to our
local registry only occurred in
On May 8, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
Please set up a pingable IP address for each new netblock and post
it to
NANOG with a request to have us ping it. It's not automated, but
it's a
good start.
Frank
You might also want to have a look at the RIPE NCC's beacon stuff:
http://www
Please set up a pingable IP address for each new netblock and post it to
NANOG with a request to have us ping it. It's not automated, but it's a
good start.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Hookins [mailto:oliver.hook...@anchor.com.au]
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:34 AM
To: nanog@
14 matches
Mail list logo
