RE: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-15 Thread Ryan Finnesey
We pay $4 per SIM with at&t then about $2.50 per MB. Cheers Ryan From: PC [mailto:paul4...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 12:15 PM To: Ryan Finnesey Cc: rche...@rochester.rr.com; nanog@nanog.org; David Hubbard Subject: Re: Cell-based OOB management devices Second

Re: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-15 Thread PC
.rr.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 6:41 AM > To: nanog@nanog.org; David Hubbard > Subject: Re: Cell-based OOB management devices > > David, a Sprint aircard can be had with a static-ip, so that should ease > remote connectivity requirements. Or, you can opt for the D

RE: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-15 Thread Ryan Finnesey
sday, November 15, 2011 6:41 AM To: nanog@nanog.org; David Hubbard Subject: Re: Cell-based OOB management devices David, a Sprint aircard can be had with a static-ip, so that should ease remote connectivity requirements. Or, you can opt for the Datalink (private VPN) service, which separates your air

Re: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-15 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
A very flexible solution can be done with the Mikrotik family of routerssee this as an example for more details.. http://mum.mikrotik.com/presentations/BR09/3G_Applications.pdf Faisal On Nov 15, 2011, at 6:34 AM, wrote: > David, a Sprint aircard can be had with a static-ip, so that should

Re: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-15 Thread rcheung
David, a Sprint aircard can be had with a static-ip, so that should ease remote connectivity requirements. Or, you can opt for the Datalink (private VPN) service, which separates your aircard traffic from other customers within a VRF, obviating the need to run a separate VPN client. -RC

Re: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-15 Thread rcheung
David, a Sprint aircard can be had with a static-ip, so that should ease remote connectivity requirements. Or, you can opt for the Datalink (private VPN) service, which separates your aircard traffic from other customers within a VRF, obviating the need to run a separate VPN client. -RC

RE: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-07 Thread ebarrios

Re: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-07 Thread Edward Salonia
I would look into Uplogix. I've seen them demo their products at Cisco Live a couple of times and they seem very good. - You can connect a cellular modem to them. - They can store backup device configs. - They can store IOS images. - They can even xmodem an image to a device if it gets stuck in RO

Re: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-07 Thread Joe Hamelin
> > On Nov 6, 2011 10:15 PM, "David Hubbard" > wrote: > > > > Hi all, I am looking at cellular-based devices as a higher > > speed alternative to dial-up backup access methods for > > out of band management during emergencies. > I've used the Digi devices for Clearwire site OOB and in many retail

Re: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-07 Thread Cameron Byrne
On Nov 6, 2011 10:15 PM, "David Hubbard" wrote: > > Hi all, I am looking at cellular-based devices as a higher > speed alternative to dial-up backup access methods for > out of band management during emergencies. I was > wondering if anyone had experiences with such devices > they could share? >

Re: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-06 Thread Dobbins, Roland
On Nov 7, 2011, at 1:14 PM, David Hubbard wrote: > Hi all, I am looking at cellular-based devices as a higher speed alternative > to dial-up backup access methods for > out of band management during emergencies. Some of the lower-end Cisco routers have '3G' interfaces available as an option, I

Re: Cell-based OOB management devices

2011-11-06 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 11/6/11 10:14 PM, David Hubbard wrote: > Hi all, I am looking at cellular-based devices as a higher > speed alternative to dial-up backup access methods for > out of band management during emergencies. I was > wondering if anyone had experiences with such devices > they could share? > > Device