Hi Ramy
I reached out to FB and they are looking for a min of 5G Traffic coming
from your AS to qualify for a Cache. Not sure how they came up with 5G as
normally everyone else would ask for 1G Traffic.
Can anyone one else confirm, maybe some one from FB is here and can clarify?
Keenan
On Feb 9
Hello Luke and all,
I stumbled upon some news about Facebook edge network servers, does anybody
know anything about the caches the FB use and the ISPs can host? and is
Facebook a part of SVA alliance?
Thanks,
Ramy
Hi Luke,
>
> Regarding HTTPS Streaming and Netflix...
>
> Netflix announced in t
Keenan
> On 11 Jan 2017, at 15:10, Luke Guillory wrote:
>
> Netflix won’t even begin talks for their cache if you're not doing a minimum
> of 5Gbps.
Outside of the US I believe it is less based on presentations I have seen in
Africa.
> They also require massive uploads to the cache often, th
t mile operators) being your only option?
>
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange
>
> The Brothers WISP
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Eric Kuhnke"
> To: "
only option?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Kuhnke"
To: "nanog@nanog.org list"
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 3:23:58 PM
Subject: Re: Bandwidth Savings
The challenge
Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Hicks"
To: "Keenan Singh"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 2:55:05 PM
Subject: Re: Bandwidth Savings
I don't know the the Car
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:08:45PM -0500, Keenan Singh wrote:
> We are currently looking at any way we can save on
> Bandwidth or to be more Efficient with the Bandwidth we currently have.
Measure what you're doing in as much detail as you can. Slice-and-dice
it by source, destination, time-of-da
The problem with the local cache[s] is the bandwidth cost of populating the
cache and keeping it coherent can be greater than the bandwidth saved. From
your description, I would expect this to be the case so a local cache will
not help. Rule of thumb is if your downstream traffic is not at least
3g
Keenan Singh writes:
> Hi Guys
>
> We are an ISP in the Caribbean, and are faced with extremely high Bandwidth
> costs, compared to the US, we currently use Peer App for Caching however
> with most services now moving to HTTPS the cache is proving to be less and
> less effective. We are currentl
Seemingly also a GGC is there: https://ix.tt/cache-services-now-live-at-ttix/
maybe if the cost is low it might be worth it, assuming the incumbent doesn’t
make it prohibitive.
Regards,
Marty Strong
--
Cloudflare - AS13335
Network Engineer
ma...@cloudflare.com
I believe the ISP is located in Trinidad & Tobago.
There are five international submarine cables that land on the island:
- SG-SCS
- Americas-II
- ECFS
- Southern Caribbean Fiber
- ECLink
Of those, 1 go to the closest real interconnectivity hub of Miami, with the
others requiring another pair on
The challenges are almost certainly economics related, at the lack of
competition and high costs for layer 1/2 transport from his Caribbean
island to Miami. Via whatever submarine cables exist that are controlled by
larger ILEC type entities/telcos. Or satellite (whether geostationary
transponder c
I don't know the the Caribbean Internet Exchanges market. Are any worth
peering at versus buying additional L2 bandwidth to Miami?
https://cw.ams-ix.net/
http://www.ocix.net/ocix/
Rick
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 8:08 PM, Keenan Singh
wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> We are an ISP in the Caribbean, and a
ubject: Re: Bandwidth Savings
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 23:08:45 -0500, Keenan Singh said:
> do have a Layer 2 Circuit between the Island and Miami, I am seeing
> there are WAN Accelerators where they would put a Server on either end
> and sort of Compress and decompress the Traffic before it goes
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 23:08:45 -0500, Keenan Singh said:
> do have a Layer 2 Circuit between the Island and Miami, I am seeing there
> are WAN Accelerators where they would put a Server on either end and sort
> of Compress and decompress the Traffic before it goes over the Layer 2, I
> have never us
I reached out to my vendor and got back the following. Also what services have
you seen move to HTTPS that you're not able to cache?
Hi Luke,
Regarding HTTPS Streaming and Netflix...
Netflix announced in the spring of 2015 that it would move to HTTPS delivery by
April of 2016. At the time of
The first step would be profiling your traffic sources. I would imagine you
probably have a bunch of YouTube, Netflix et al. content, that those content
providers will send you a cache box for, subject to minimum traffic
requirements.
Regards,
Marty Strong
--
17 matches
Mail list logo
