Carrier oem churn (turnover /agitation cycles)
First mover for features happen and leapfrog but the ones that matter get
adopted across the line in time.
> On May 7, 2015, at 8:40 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>
> What churn rates are you talking about?
>
> Josh Reynolds
> CIO, SPITwSPOTS
> www.
LOL :)
On May 7, 2015 9:38:15 AM AKDT, Rob Seastrom wrote:
>
>More like "at least be willing to man up and learn your way around
>some platform other than RHEL without whining if there is a business
>need for it".
>
>-r
>
>Josh Reynolds writes:
>
>> *grumble, grumble, grumble*
>> "Get off my law
More like "at least be willing to man up and learn your way around
some platform other than RHEL without whining if there is a business
need for it".
-r
Josh Reynolds writes:
> *grumble, grumble, grumble*
> "Get off my lawn!"
> :)
>
>
> On May 7, 2015 8:49:43 AM AKDT, Rob Seastrom wrote:
>
>
You know where these people wouldn't fit? W/ISPs.
Every three years or so you are forklifting the majority of your wireless PtMP
for either a new series or a totally different vendor. New backhaul vendors
often. You're building AC and DC power plants. You likely touch Cisco, juniper,
HP, mikrot
we do "cry" when we interview people that claim to have "advanced
knowledge" of BGP and we ask them some very basic BGP questions, and we get
a blank stare.
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Rob Seastrom wrote:
>
> Josh Reynolds writes:
>
> > It really bothers me to see that people in this i
*grumble, grumble, grumble*
"Get off my lawn!"
:)
On May 7, 2015 8:49:43 AM AKDT, Rob Seastrom wrote:
>
>Josh Reynolds writes:
>
>> It really bothers me to see that people in this industry are so
>> worried about a change of syntax or terminology. If there's one
>> thing about the big vendors
> It really bothers me to see that people in this industry are so worried about
> a change of syntax or terminology. If there's one thing about the big
> vendors that bothers me, it's that these batteries of vendor specific tests
> have allowed many "techs" to get lazy. They simply can't seem to op
Josh Reynolds writes:
> It really bothers me to see that people in this industry are so
> worried about a change of syntax or terminology. If there's one
> thing about the big vendors that bothers me, it's that these
> batteries of vendor specific tests have allowed many "techs" to get
> lazy. T
It really bothers me to see that people in this industry are so worried about a
change of syntax or terminology. If there's one thing about the big vendors
that bothers me, it's that these batteries of vendor specific tests have
allowed many "techs" to get lazy. They simply can't seem to operate
And if you ever need to find out what can commands exist for a certain
string "xxx"
tree flat detail | match xxx
is a huge helper when learning.
e.g.
A:router# tree flat detail | match aspath-regex
show router bgp routes [ [type ]] aspath-regex
show router bgp routes [ []] aspath-regex
On Th
yep.. its way easier and faster to take a look at what is configured:
A:R01>config>service>vprn# interface "to-what-ever-eBGP"
A:R01>config>service>vprn>if# info
--
description "L3 Ckt ID: "
enable-ingress-stat
> On May 6, 2015, at 5:24 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
>
> I am worried as most tech's know Cisco and Juniper, so going to ALU would
> be a learning curve based on replies I am getting off list.
It’s not that hard to learn if you know the basics of IP routing. I just did
an implementation of A-L 7
co or Juniper. They have tab
and ? completion now for both commands as well as elements similar to Junos
which is helpful.
Phil
-Original Message-
From: "Bob Evans"
Sent: 5/6/2015 11:55 PM
To: "nanog@nanog.org"
Subject: Re: Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router (SR)
Forgot to send this yesterday…
We use them in our networks along with ASR9Ks and MXs. There are a lot of them
deployed around the world doing very similar things as ASRs and MXs. The
config is more like Juniper than Cisco IMHO. Being kind of the “3rd” vendor
they have a tendency to implemen
> I am worried as most tech's know Cisco and Juniper, so going to ALU would
> be a learning curve based on replies I am getting off list.
It's definitely quite different from the CLI. I'm still dabbling, but the guys
here who have been through the training and are immersed in it really like it.
Phil
-Original Message-
From: "Bob Evans"
Sent: 5/6/2015 11:55 PM
To: "nanog@nanog.org"
Subject: Re: Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router (SR)
I will be getting one to try. I am pretty sure it will support the ol'
"show ? ,config ?" If not
that second command is "admin display-config" or "admin display-config |
match "
cheers
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Bob Evans
wrote:
>
> I will be getting one to try. I am pretty sure it will support the ol'
> "show ? ,config ?" If not that might be a problem :-)
>
> Thank You
I will be getting one to try. I am pretty sure it will support the ol'
"show ? ,config ?" If not that might be a problem :-)
Thank You
Bob Evans
CTO
> What's the price point of an SR-A4? Comparable to the MX104 or ASR9001?
>
> -- Stephen
>
> On 2015-05-06 7:13 PM, Craig wrote:
>>
What's the price point of an SR-A4? Comparable to the MX104 or ASR9001?
-- Stephen
On 2015-05-06 7:13 PM, Craig wrote:
If you know Juniper and Cisco, the learning curve isn't so bad to pick up
the ALU CLI, after working with it for a brief time, you catch on quickly.
Their products are quite i
If you know Juniper and Cisco, the learning curve isn't so bad to pick up
the ALU CLI, after working with it for a brief time, you catch on quickly.
Their products are quite impressive, and a # of the carriers, are moving to
them and some have already moved to them and are quite happy with their
de
I am worried as most tech's know Cisco and Juniper, so going to ALU would
be a learning curve based on replies I am getting off list.
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Dan Snyder wrote:
>
> They are definitely good for that. We use them in part of our network for
> something very similar.
>
> I am
They are definitely good for that. We use them in part of our network for
something very similar.
I am not sure why they aren't mentioned that much. I know that they have been
pretty popular in the past couple years.
We are planning on using 7750 SR-a4's in the future but right now we mainly
--- colton.co...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Colton Conor
Why is ALU never mentioned, but Juniper MX
and Cisco are all day long?
-
Because they're really expensive, mostly bell
head networks use them and we're mostly bell
head free on NANOG... >;-)
scott
> On May 6, 2015, at 5:48 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
>
> I was wondering if anyone was using a
> Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router> (SR)
> in their network? How does this platform
> compare the the Cisco ASR, Brocade MLXe,
> and Juniper MX line?
-
I haven't u
Taking full BGP routes from 4+ carriers on 10G connections. Why is ALU
never mentioned, but Juniper MX and Cisco are all day long?
The new 7750 SR-a4 looks like a Juniper MX80 or MX104 killer.
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Dan Snyder wrote:
> We have been using them for almost 8 years now and
We have been using them for almost 8 years now and have been pretty happy. What
are you looking to use them for?
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 6, 2015, at 5:48 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
>
> I was wondering if anyone was using a Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router
> (SR) in their network? How does
26 matches
Mail list logo
