On Mar 26, 2012, at 9:32 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:59:34 -0400, Rodrick Brown said:
>> HIgh frequency trading does provide a service to the financial markets as a
>> whole despite what the media and government politicians will have you think.
>
> OK, I'll bite. W
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:59:34 -0400, Rodrick Brown said:
> HIgh frequency trading does provide a service to the financial markets as a
> whole despite what the media and government politicians will have you think.
OK, I'll bite. What benefit does the market *as a whole* get from the ability
to do t
On Mar 23, 2012, at 2:45 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>>> The massive drop in latency is expected to supercharge algorithmic stock
>>> market trading, where a difference of a few milliseconds can gain (or lose)
>>> millions of dollars.
>> But it should be illegal to
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:16:53 +0200, Tei said:
> I imagine a easier solution. Use a random number generator in both
> sides, with the same seed. Then use a slower way to send "packets
> re-sync" that will contain the delta from the generated number, to the
> real actual number.
Congrats. You've
Tei wrote on 03/26/2012 06:16:53 AM:
> I imagine a easier solution. Use a random number generator in both
> sides, with the same seed. Then use a slower way to send "packets
> re-sync" that will contain the delta from the generated number, to the
> real actual number.
>
> I suppose this speeds
On 23 March 2012 13:31, Aled Morris wrote:
> On 23 March 2012 11:53, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>
>> All three cables are being laid for the same reasons: Redundancy and speed.
>> As it stands, it takes roughly 230 milliseconds for a packet to go from
>> London to Tokyo; the new cables will reduce this b
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 12:51 AM, George Herbert
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Marshall Eubanks
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:14 PM, wrote:
>>> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:16:59 -0700, George Herbert said:
The physics is not conducive to improving the situation a lot.
>
On 24/03/2012 00:32, George Bonser wrote:
> I suggested this once when it was decided that the latency from
> California to the UK was too high and that I should reduce it. The
> company wouldn't go for it, though.
I assume they had a practical alternative to your proposition? Perhaps
making lig
Hey $1.5Bn would get you less than half of Spotify right now, so it seems
like a good deal.
--
---
Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
VP (Admin) - ISO
On 3/24/12 01:32 , George Bonser wrote:
>> If they could armor the cable sufficiently perhaps they could drill the
>> straigh line path through the Earth's crust (mantle and outer core) and
>> do London-Tokyo in less than 10,000km.
Current record depth of a borehole is under 12,500 meters which is
On 3/23/12 19:45 , Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>>> The massive drop in latency is expected to supercharge algorithmic stock
>>> market trading, where a difference of a few milliseconds can gain (or
>>> lose)
>>> millions of dollars.
>>
>> But it should be illegal to run
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Marshall Eubanks
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:14 PM, wrote:
>> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:16:59 -0700, George Herbert said:
>>> The physics is not conducive to improving the situation a lot.
>>>
>>> There's probably $1.5 billion in the ground already in neutrin
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:14 PM, wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:16:59 -0700, George Herbert said:
>> The physics is not conducive to improving the situation a lot.
>>
>> There's probably $1.5 billion in the ground already in neutrino
>> detectors; the total combined detector bit rate is pretty p
>
> I'd be quite interested in seeing the MTTR for a sub-ice cable break
> which happened in late october.
>
> Nick
Well, you won't have to worry about people dragging anchor across the cable.
Other than earthquake or volcanic eruption, I can't imagine what would damage a
cable that time of y
> If they could armor the cable sufficiently perhaps they could drill the
> straigh line path through the Earth's crust (mantle and outer core) and
> do London-Tokyo in less than 10,000km.
>
> Aled
I suggested this once when it was decided that the latency from California to
the UK was too high
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 23/03/2012 15:16, Joel jaeggli wrote:
>> Notwithstanding how bad an idea high speed trading from the vantage
>> point of those who don't participate in it, 60ms would place you at a
>> competitive disadvantage to traders that are collocat
>From the abstract: "The link achieved a decoded data rate of 0.1
bits/sec with a bit error rate of 1% over a distance of 1.035 km,
including 240 m of earth."
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.2847v1.pdf
For practical communications, at longer distances, you probably lose
beam intensity as a 1/R^2 funct
Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> >> The massive drop in latency is expected to supercharge algorithmic stock
> >> market trading, where a difference of a few milliseconds can gain (or lose)
> >> millions of dollars.
> >
> > But it should be illegal to run a stock market
You guys joke but here is n little article from last week on the current
state of Neutrino communications:
http://www.economist.com/node/21550242
"The neutrinos themselves are created by smashing bunches of protons into
a target made of graphite. They are detected roughly 1km away by researc
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:16:59 -0700, George Herbert said:
> The physics is not conducive to improving the situation a lot.
>
> There's probably $1.5 billion in the ground already in neutrino
> detectors; the total combined detector bit rate is pretty poor. One
> experiment looking at neutrinos comi
- Original Message -
> From: "Phil Regnauld"
> Subject: Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms
> Vitkovsky, Adam (avitkovsky) writes:
> >
> > Can't wait for the neutrino SFPs :)
>
> You know the shipping cost on a 2
t;
> Regards
> Marshall
>
>> Can't wait for the neutrino SFPs :)
>>
>> adam
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Aled Morris [mailto:al...@qix.co.uk]
>> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 1:31 PM
>> To: Eugen Leitl
>> Cc: NANOG list
>
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
The massive drop in latency is expected to supercharge algorithmic stock
market trading, where a difference of a few milliseconds can gain (or lose)
millions of dollars.
But it should be illegal to run a stock market that volatile. This can't end
well.
The ave
12 1:31 PM
> To: Eugen Leitl
> Cc: NANOG list
> Subject: Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms
>
> On 23 March 2012 11:53, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>
>> All three cables are being laid for the same reasons: Redundancy and speed.
>> As it stands, it
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:21 AM, wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:56:46 -, Brandon Butterworth said:
>> > I'd be quite interested in seeing the MTTR for a sub-ice cable break which
>> > happened in late october.
>>
>> More fun too when we get global warming under control and there's no
>> lon
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:56:46 -, Brandon Butterworth said:
> > I'd be quite interested in seeing the MTTR for a sub-ice cable break which
> > happened in late october.
>
> More fun too when we get global warming under control and there's no
> longer any way to reach it
Submarines. It's alleged
Hello,
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:52:21 +
Nick Hilliard wrote:
> I'd be quite interested in seeing the MTTR for a sub-ice cable break which
> happened in late october.
Maybe that's the reason they want to build three with different paths ;)
Paul
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
What about those -- I assume successful -- experiments to fire
neutrinos straight through the earth as a communications medium?
Not sure what the bandwidth of a neutrino stream is.
On March 23, 2012 at 12:31 al...@qix.co.uk (Aled Morris) wrote:
> On 23 March 2012 11:53, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>
> I'd be quite interested in seeing the MTTR for a sub-ice cable break which
> happened in late october.
More fun too when we get global warming under control and there's no
longer any way to reach it
brandon
On 23/03/2012 15:16, Joel jaeggli wrote:
> Notwithstanding how bad an idea high speed trading from the vantage
> point of those who don't participate in it, 60ms would place you at a
> competitive disadvantage to traders that are collocated at or near the
> exchange, such that if you're engaged in
On 3/23/12 14:47 , valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:53:45 +0100, Eugen Leitl said:
>> http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/122989-1-5-billion-the-cost-of-cutting-london-toyko-latency-by-60ms
>
> Lower latency is good...
>
>> The massive drop in latency is expected to supercha
com]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 2:20 PM
To: Vitkovsky, Adam; Aled Morris; Eugen Leitl
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: RE: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms
> -Original Message-
> From: Vitkovsky, Adam [mailto:avitkov...@emea.att.com]
> Sent: 23 March 20
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:53:45 +0100, Eugen Leitl said:
> http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/122989-1-5-billion-the-cost-of-cutting-london-toyko-latency-by-60ms
Lower latency is good...
> The massive drop in latency is expected to supercharge algorithmic stock
> market trading, where a difference o
> -Original Message-
> From: Vitkovsky, Adam [mailto:avitkov...@emea.att.com]
> Sent: 23 March 2012 12:57
> To: Aled Morris; Eugen Leitl
> Cc: NANOG list
> Subject: RE: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by
> 60ms
>
> That is why there&#x
Vitkovsky, Adam (avitkovsky) writes:
>
> Can't wait for the neutrino SFPs :)
You know the shipping cost on a 2 light year thick lead SFP ?
rris [mailto:al...@qix.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 1:31 PM
To: Eugen Leitl
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms
On 23 March 2012 11:53, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> All three cables are being laid for the same reasons: Redundancy and speed.
> A
On 23 March 2012 11:53, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> All three cables are being laid for the same reasons: Redundancy and speed.
> As it stands, it takes roughly 230 milliseconds for a packet to go from
> London to Tokyo; the new cables will reduce this by 30% to 170ms. This
> speed-up will be gained by
Yeah this is super cool!
I hope ISPs will peer well once cable is ready!
(Sent from my mobile device)
Anurag Bhatia
http://anuragbhatia.com
On Mar 23, 2012 5:24 PM, "Eugen Leitl" wrote:
>
>
> http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/122989-1-5-billion-the-cost-of-cutting-london-toyko-latency-by-60ms
38 matches
Mail list logo
