* Pradeep Bangera:
> Question: Does this over-usage bandwidth charge a linear cost function
> or is it sub-linear like the committed bandwidth pricing?
Percentile-based pricing is never linear. It's not even a continuous
function of bandwidth usage. This is inherent to the percentile
functional
I don't know every particular deal, but I felt it's a solution to the
person's situation whom I replied to who was producing fake traffic for
bandwidth they purchase.
The point is to suggest that his pricing scheme where it's potential for the
total bill to be cheaper by purposely wasting a resour
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:31:34AM -0700, Ryan Malayter wrote:
> On Sep 22, 12:54 am, PC wrote:
> > An optimal solution would be a tiered system where the adjusted price only
> > applies to traffic units over the price tier threshold and not retroactively
> > to all traffic units.
>
> I have seen
I like thisone!
> As I recall, their scheme went something like:
> invoice_amount = some_constant * (quantity)^0.75
--
//fredan
On Sep 22, 12:54 am, PC wrote:
> An optimal solution would be a tiered system where the adjusted price only
> applies to traffic units over the price tier threshold and not retroactively
> to all traffic units.
I have seen a more "optimal" scheme about 15 years ago. Pricing was a
smooth functio
On Sep 22, 2011, at 1:54 AM, PC wrote:
> An optimal solution would be a tiered system where the adjusted price only
> applies to traffic units over the price tier threshold and not retroactively
> to all traffic units.
Optimal for whom?
Also, I doubt you can make that claim as you do not know
An optimal solution would be a tiered system where the adjusted price only
applies to traffic units over the price tier threshold and not retroactively
to all traffic units.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Brandon Galbraith <
brandon.galbra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:06 PM
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> If you have a lot more, you can negotiate tiers. E.g. The first 10G is
> $X/Mbps, but if you hit 20G, you get charged 2 * $Y (where Y < X,
> obviously). This can lead to interesting situations where 19 Gbps costs
> more than 20 Gb
On Sep 21, 2011, at 9:58 PM, Pradeep Bangera wrote:
> I have a fundamental question regarding 95th percentile pricing. I will
> make some prerequisite assumptions to set $/Mbps values before posting
> my actual question.
>
> Eg., For 1Gbps commitment, I will pay roughly $3/Mbps. Similarly for
> 1
Hello NANOG,
I have a fundamental question regarding 95th percentile pricing. I will
make some prerequisite assumptions to set $/Mbps values before posting
my actual question.
Eg., For 1Gbps commitment, I will pay roughly $3/Mbps. Similarly for
10Gbps, 100Gbps I may pay $2/Mbps and $1/Mbps.
This
10 matches
Mail list logo
