On 2019-03-24 00:32, Thomas Bellman wrote:
They do have limited feature set, though. E.g, they only look at
the first 64 octets of each packet (and that includes L2 and L2.5
headers) when deciding what to do with a packet, and can't chase
the IPv6 header chain; thus, if there is an extension hea
On 2019-03-23 12:41 -0700, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> I am trying to get my hands on some QFX5000s and I have a rather quick
> question.
First, there is no model named QFX5000. There is QFX5100, QFX5110,
QFX5120, QFX5200 and QFX5210 (and some of them have several submodels,
e.g. QFX5100-48T, QFX5100-
Hi,
> thanks for quick reply. I forgot to mention, 2 x 10G providers with full
> routing table on each.
Those QFXs won't be able to hold full routing tables:
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/topic-map/layer-2-forwarding-tables.html#id-configuring-the-unified-forwarding-ta
On 3/23/19 1:41 PM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
Hey there,
Hi,
in QFX, I am trying to see if I need EX or not? more importantly
(besides from what juniper papers say) are there any known issues people
run into for a small scale deployment. (100mbps-1gbps range 1 rack, 20
servers)
my plan is to ha
.
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Joseph Jenkins
Sent: Sunday, 24 March 2019 9:43 AM
To: nanog
Subject: Re: QFX5k question
I have 4 QFX51xx switches in a virtual chassis and have no problems pushing
that much traffic through them for several hundred servers with 10GB uplinks.
On March 23, 2019
I have 4 QFX51xx switches in a virtual chassis and have no problems pushing
that much traffic through them for several hundred servers with 10GB
uplinks.
On March 23, 2019 at 12:42:52 PM, Mehmet Akcin (meh...@akcin.net) wrote:
Hey there,
I am trying to get my hands on some QFX5000s and I have a
* meh...@akcin.net (Mehmet Akcin) [Sat 23 Mar 2019, 20:53 CET]:
thanks for quick reply. I forgot to mention, 2 x 10G providers with
full routing table on each.
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/topic-map/unified-forwarding-table-D15-qfx-series.html#UFT-table-profile-tbl
thanks for quick reply. I forgot to mention, 2 x 10G providers with full
routing table on each.
thank you...
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 12:45 PM Paul S. wrote:
> QFX5100 as a L3 router + L2 switch performed well for us in the past, I
> don't see why it'd fall over in <1g traffic now.
>
> You shoul
QFX5100 as a L3 router + L2 switch performed well for us in the past, I
don't see why it'd fall over in <1g traffic now.
You should be good to go.
On 3/24/2019 04:41 午前, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
Hey there,
I am trying to get my hands on some QFX5000s and I have a rather quick
question.
In the p
Hey there,
I am trying to get my hands on some QFX5000s and I have a rather quick
question.
In the past, I often used MX + EX where MX did routing and I connected all
uplinks/peering and EX, and EX did switching, i connected my servers to ex.
in QFX, I am trying to see if I need EX or not? more
10 matches
Mail list logo
