Re: PSTN address expansion

2011-02-11 Thread Joel Jaeggli
On 2/11/11 8:59 PM, Jeff Kell wrote: > On 2/11/2011 11:28 PM, Jack Bates wrote: >> My apologies for the error, it will actually be a 32 digit system, and >> we're switching to base-16, so all phones will have to be replaced >> with phones supporting 0-9A-F. > > Well, they already do, you just need

Re: PSTN address expansion

2011-02-11 Thread Jeff Kell
On 2/11/2011 11:28 PM, Jack Bates wrote: > My apologies for the error, it will actually be a 32 digit system, and > we're switching to base-16, so all phones will have to be replaced > with phones supporting 0-9A-F. Well, they already do, you just need a military phone or a linesman's handset to g

Re: PSTN address expansion

2011-02-11 Thread Jack Bates
On 2/11/2011 10:17 PM, Jack Bates wrote: Bah, I substitute your short sighted 12 digits with 40 digit dialing! However, because the numbers are too long to remember, you only have to speak or type in the name of someone you want to call, and 15 digits can be assigned to every household or bus

Re: PSTN address expansion

2011-02-11 Thread Jack Bates
On 2/11/2011 9:54 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: - Original Message - From: "Jack Bates" On 2/11/2011 9:31 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: If you want to compare masses, IPv4 = 7 liters of water. IPv6 = EARTH, including all rocks, trees, oceans, lakes, puddles, etc. Was trying to explain thing

PSTN address expansion (was: Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...)

2011-02-11 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Jack Bates" > On 2/11/2011 9:31 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: > > If you want to compare masses, IPv4 = 7 liters of water. > > IPv6 = EARTH, including all rocks, trees, oceans, lakes, puddles, > > etc. > > Was trying to explain things to a telco VP today. Final