Re: PRISM Update: NYT says WaPo a bit credulous

2013-06-08 Thread Rich Kulawiec
On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 06:23:19AM +, Dobbins, Roland wrote: > There's another potential explanation: [snip] *puts on evil hat, adjusts for snug fit* Targeting the technical people who actually have their hands on the gear might be the best choice. They don't have the power, wealth and soapb

Re: PRISM Update: NYT says WaPo a bit credulous

2013-06-07 Thread Dobbins, Roland
On Jun 8, 2013, at 10:11 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > Well, ok, they don't actually *say* that, but it's the underlying idea behind > their own piece, which says that the listed companies didn't really give NSA > quite such unfettered access There's another potential explanation: from

PRISM Update: NYT says WaPo a bit credulous

2013-06-07 Thread Jay Ashworth
Well, ok, they don't actually *say* that, but it's the underlying idea behind their own piece, which says that the listed companies didn't really give NSA quite such unfettered access: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/08/technology/tech-companies-bristling-concede-to-government-surveillance-efforts.