RE: Networking performance

2009-02-11 Thread Justin Krejci
: Friday, February 06, 2009 12:59 PM To: Deric Kwok Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Networking performance Deric Kwok wrote: > Hi > > I would like to ask your professional experience about switch throughput > > I have Gig Switchs eg: H P3400 /3500, cisco c4 948../ dlink > In the

Re: Networking performance

2009-02-06 Thread Patrick W. Gilmore
On Feb 6, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Deric Kwok wrote: I would like to ask your professional experience about switch throughput I have Gig Switchs eg: H P3400 /3500, cisco c4 948../ dlink In their spec, they said that it can handles Gig So far, I couldn't see their ports are used up over 200M in mrtg

Re: Networking performance

2009-02-06 Thread Joel Jaeggli
Deric Kwok wrote: > Hi > > I would like to ask your professional experience about switch throughput > > I have Gig Switchs eg: H P3400 /3500, cisco c4 948../ dlink > In their spec, they said that it can handles Gig > So far, I couldn't see their ports are used up over 200M in mrtg graph > when I

RE: Networking performance

2009-02-06 Thread Mills, Charles
Make sure MRTG is using SNMPv2 when it does its data gathering otherwise you'll suffer from counter rollover. -Original Message- From: Deric Kwok [mailto:deric.kwok2...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 1:44 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Networking performance Hi I

Networking performance

2009-02-06 Thread Deric Kwok
Hi I would like to ask your professional experience about switch throughput I have Gig Switchs eg: H P3400 /3500, cisco c4 948../ dlink In their spec, they said that it can handles Gig So far, I couldn't see their ports are used up over 200M in mrtg graph when I try to transfer 3G size files to f