M
To: Jim Miller
Cc: Abdul Nazeer; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Need advise for a linux firewall
Microtik makes a pretty robust Linux based firewall
appliance-on-a-usb-stick. It does a lot out of the box like BGP, VPN,
MPLS,QoS and all kinds of other crazy things you wouldn't expect to fit
on
on
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Staal [mailto:dst...@usa.net]
> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 1:37 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Need advise for a linux firewall
>
> --As of March 11, 2010 4:22:38 PM +, gordon b slater is alleged to
> have
>
--As of March 11, 2010 4:22:38 PM +, gordon b slater is alleged to have
said:
One caveat for the current PFsense: traffic shaping in 1.2.3 release is
somewhat borked (1.2.2 works much better) and it doesn't work with more
than 2 interfaces, so 1 wan - 1 lan is OK.
--As for the rest, it is
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Abdul Nazeer wrote:
> On 03/11/2010 11:22 AM, gordon b slater wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 11:00 -0500, Abdul Nazeer wrote:
>>
>>
>>> iptables, but if anyone has any other suggestion, I'd love to hear it.
>>>
>> PFsense, (being freeBSD-based, comes under your
Microtik makes a pretty robust Linux based firewall
appliance-on-a-usb-stick. It does a lot out of the box like BGP, VPN,
MPLS,QoS and all kinds of other crazy things you wouldn't expect to fit on
one gig of flash. It takes my HP about 10 seconds to load a full table.
My vote is for PFSense though
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Abdul Nazeer wrote:
> On 03/11/2010 11:22 AM, gordon b slater wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 11:00 -0500, Abdul Nazeer wrote:
> >
> >
> >> iptables, but if anyone has any other suggestion, I'd love to hear it.
> >>
> > PFsense, (being freeBSD-based, comes under
On 03/11/2010 11:22 AM, gordon b slater wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 11:00 -0500, Abdul Nazeer wrote:
>
>
>> iptables, but if anyone has any other suggestion, I'd love to hear it.
>>
> PFsense, (being freeBSD-based, comes under your "other" category)
> It uses the OpenBSD-based pf firewa
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:06 PM, gordon b slater wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 09:01 -0800, Marty Anstey wrote:
>
>> +1 for pfsense. I've been running it for over 18 months with no problems
>> whatsoever. It does everything I needed it to do, and quite a bit more.
>
>
> actually, reading back on
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 09:01 -0800, Marty Anstey wrote:
> +1 for pfsense. I've been running it for over 18 months with no problems
> whatsoever. It does everything I needed it to do, and quite a bit more.
actually, reading back on the nanog list for a few plays (playing
catch-up here) pfsense wou
>
> PFsense, (being freeBSD-based, comes under your "other" category)
> It uses the OpenBSD-based pf firewall, with a web-based GUI for almost
> everything (except maybe console resets). works for me in several
> locations, some `heavy and high`.
>
>
+1 for pfsense. I've been running it for
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 11:00 -0500, Abdul Nazeer wrote:
> iptables, but if anyone has any other suggestion, I'd love to hear it.
PFsense, (being freeBSD-based, comes under your "other" category)
It uses the OpenBSD-based pf firewall, with a web-based GUI for almost
everything (except maybe consol
try http://www.zeroshell.net/eng/
2010/3/11 Abdul Nazeer :
> Looking for advise on setting up a linux based dedicated firewall.
> Apparently, there are plenty:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_router_or_firewall_distributions
>
> I'm looking to have the firewall sit in front of a public ne
fwbuilder
Looking for advise on setting up a linux based dedicated firewall.
Apparently, there are plenty:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_router_or_firewall_distributions
I'm looking to have the firewall sit in front of a public network of
windows boxes. Also, would want to be able to load-balance an
14 matches
Mail list logo
