Re: Need BGP route check

2016-05-23 Thread John Kemp
m: Ken Chase [mailto:k...@sizone.org] >> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 11:39 AM >> To: Matthew Huff >> Cc: nanog@nanog.org >> Subject: Re: Need BGP route check >> >> $ telnet route-views.oregon-ix.net >> Username: rviews >> >> $ show ip bgp p

Re: Need BGP route check

2016-05-23 Thread Giuseppe Spanò - Datacast Srl
Here you are with our point of view (Italy - AS200873) BGP routing table entry for 129.77.0.0/16, version 147288840 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default) Advertised to update-groups: 3 28716 6939 46887 14607 14607, (received & used) as you can see we receive it as generated by AS1

AW: Need BGP route check (UPDATE)

2016-05-20 Thread Jürgen Jaritsch
anog.org] Im Auftrag von Matthew Huff Gesendet: Freitag, 20. Mai 2016 18:11 An: Eric Tykwinski Cc: nanog@nanog.org Betreff: RE: Need BGP route check (UPDATE) >From responses I received, I have gotten a number of different answers. Some >are seeing our routes from 6128, some from 46887 and a

RE: Need BGP route check (UPDATE)

2016-05-20 Thread Matthew Huff
7 OTA Management LLC   | Phone: 914-460-4039 aim: matthewbhuff    | Fax:   914-694-5669 > -Original Message- > From: Eric Tykwinski [mailto:eric-l...@truenet.com] > Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 11:48 AM > To: Matthew Huff > Subject: RE: Need BGP route check > >

RE: Need BGP route check

2016-05-20 Thread Matthew Huff
11:39 AM > To: Matthew Huff > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: Need BGP route check > > $ telnet route-views.oregon-ix.net > Username: rviews > > $ show ip bgp paths 14607 > > might help > > /kc > > > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 03:31:48PM +,

Re: Need BGP route check

2016-05-20 Thread Bob Evans
Hello, here ya go. Routes: Destination PeerNext-HopLPref Weight MED AS-Path i 129.77.0.0/16 64.118.161.864.118.161.8722 2 0 6939 46887 1

AW: Need BGP route check

2016-05-20 Thread Jürgen Jaritsch
ührer: Alexander Windbichler Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] Im Auftrag von Matthew Huff Gesendet: Freitag, 20. Mai 2016 17:32 An: nanog@nanog.org Betreff: Need BGP route c

Need BGP route check

2016-05-20 Thread Matthew Huff
One of our upstreams is apparently having problems, although they don't appear to know about it. I've seen an alert at BGPmon.net about our prefixes being withdrawn, and I can't locate our prefixes through that provider on any routeviews. Can someone check to see what ASPATHS you are seeing for