I'm sorry, I should have phrased differently.
I meant: By the number of responses I've received that have been told to me
"in private," or with a "this is not public info,"...
While I certainly would not violate those restraints I do agree with you.
jamie
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Dobb
On Oct 28, 2013, at 5:27 PM, jamie rishaw wrote:
> It's clear that we all still consider open discussions on things like this
> to be something to be kept to a small vetted community.
It's not clear to me at all.
Real-time discussions of specific events in order to coordinate response, sure
1) Thank you all for responses in private re my 80Gbps thread - It's clear
that we all still consider open discussions on things like this to be
something to be kept to a small vetted community.
2) Surprised to see no threads on Terremark's epic fail w/r/t Fed-Cloud and
healthcare.gov. News artic
3 matches
Mail list logo
