In message <2fb9deb1-95b5-4a26-8723-35f157f98...@arin.net>,
John Curran wrote:
>There is no problem with also marking resource records which have no valid
>POC's (even if not specifically stated by policy). It is an operational qu
>estion
>not a resource policy question, and we generally handl
On Oct 3, 2010, at 7:24 AM, "Ronald F. Guilmette"
wrote:
> I'm sitting here looking at your NRPM 3.6 and it says:
>
> Unresponsive POC email addresses shall be marked as such in the database.
>
> OK, Fine. So do you have a problem with ``marking those in the data base''
> and specifically wi
> So OK, John... Can you explain yourself... please? Why did you say you
> were accepting my request into your suggestion box, when it appears that
> ARIN has already been doing exactly the thing I asked for... even if only
> haphazardly, in a disorganized way, and only within a limited number of
In message ,
John Curran wrote:
>On Oct 3, 2010, at 5:15 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
>> Is that a "Yes, ARIN will begin immeditely putting these annotations into
>> all of the AS and IP records associated with POCs we already know are
>> uncontactable" ?
>
>That's a "No".
>
>I'd say "Yes" t
On Oct 3, 2010, at 5:15 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> Is that a "Yes, ARIN will begin immeditely putting these annotations into
> all of the AS and IP records associated with POCs we already know are
> uncontactable" ?
That's a "No".
I'd say "Yes" to "Is ARIN is implementing the policy at NR
In message <3070d3c0-513d-4cb9-8ec2-eb22ca52a...@arin.net>,
John Curran wrote:
>On Oct 3, 2010, at 3:51 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>> Comment:The information for this network has been reported to
>> Comment:be invalid. ARIN has attempted to obtain updated data, but
>> has
On Oct 3, 2010, at 3:51 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> So while I was looking at the WHOIS records for the set of blocks that were
> (apparently now past tense) being 'jacked by AS14202 earlier today (Saturday)
> I happened to come across the following annotation in one of the relevant
> IP bloc
In message <17104.1285997...@tristatelogic.com>, I wrote:
>>> If you can put an annotation into a whois records for a POC,
>>> saying explicity that you can't get ahold of this person, then it would
>>> seem to me to be a rather trivial matter of programming to transplant
>>> a very similar sort
8 matches
Mail list logo
