On Sun, 18 Apr 2010, Larry Sheldon wrote:
Have you checked cyclops and other BGP announcement tracking systems
to see if it might have been a short-lived whack-a-mole short prefix hijack
(pop up, announce block, send burst of spam, remove announcement, disappear
again)?
Maybe I'm just tired a
On 4/18/2010 16:02, Matthew Petach wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 10:15 AM, gordon b slater wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 16:45 -0400, William Herrin wrote:
>>
>>> Interesting; I see similar results for my address space. Two
>>> addresses, one of which hasn't been attached to a machine for a d
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 10:15 AM, gordon b slater wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 16:45 -0400, William Herrin wrote:
>
>> Interesting; I see similar results for my address space. Two
>> addresses, one of which hasn't been attached to a machine for a decade
>> and the other a virtual IP on a web ser
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 16:45 -0400, William Herrin wrote:
> Interesting; I see similar results for my address space. Two
> addresses, one of which hasn't been attached to a machine for a decade
> and the other a virtual IP on a web server where the particular IP
> never emits connections. Magnitude
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, William Herrin wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Mike wrote:
I've tried to get the attention of senderbase, which is claiming activity
from my address space which is in fact either un-routed or within dynamic
subscriber blocks that have outbound smtp filtering in e
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Mike wrote:
> I've tried to get the attention of senderbase, which is claiming activity
> from my address space which is in fact either un-routed or within dynamic
> subscriber blocks that have outbound smtp filtering in effect.
Interesting; I see similar result
>I've tried to get the attention of senderbase, which is claiming
>activity from my address space which is in fact either un-routed or
>within dynamic subscriber blocks that have outbound smtp filtering in
>effect. Unfortunately, senderbase refuses to acknowledge the problem in
>their data
* Mike:
>I've tried to get the attention of senderbase, which is claiming
> activity from my address space which is in fact either un-routed or
> within dynamic subscriber blocks that have outbound smtp filtering in
> effect.
Could you share technical details on your filters, please?
If you
Gang,
I've tried to get the attention of senderbase, which is claiming
activity from my address space which is in fact either un-routed or
within dynamic subscriber blocks that have outbound smtp filtering in
effect. Unfortunately, senderbase refuses to acknowledge the problem in
their dat
Thanks,
-bong
--
Message: 7
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:24:35 +0700
From: Roland Dobbins
Subject: Re: NEED Some HELP
To: NANOG list
Message-ID: <0d85644f-a83f-461b-a9fb-eebf54259...@arbor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes
On Oct 10, 2009, at
On Oct 10, 2009, at 4:12 PM, Bong Barnido wrote:
I cannot ping the IP on my Cisco 6509 from the internet.
Quite out of the context of the connectivity issue you're trying to
troubleshoot, it's in fact extremely desirable to have your 6509 (and
all your routers, for that matter) unpingable
Hi Nanog Members,
I've been troubleshooting this problem for a few days already but i'm still
unable to fix it. I think it's now time to ask some help from Nanog members.
I cannot ping the IP on my Cisco 6509 from the internet.
Here are the setup:
*Internet*---(copper)-->*GSR*(fiber)--->* Ci
12 matches
Mail list logo
