Re: Moving to IPv6 (Was: NANOG 40 agenda posted)

2007-05-27 Thread Jared Mauch
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 05:32:04PM +0100, Brandon Butterworth wrote: > > > Because for IPv6 to be useful to the masses, content is required. > > Indeed. I'd hoped there would be time to finish the multicast project > first. I'll kick off getting BBC content up on v6 > > > The really big problem

Re: Moving to IPv6 (Was: NANOG 40 agenda posted)

2007-05-27 Thread Brandon Butterworth
> > Because for IPv6 to be useful to the masses, content is required. Indeed. I'd hoped there would be time to finish the multicast project first. I'll kick off getting BBC content up on v6 > The really big problem is that > there is a case that when you do enable 's on your service that > s

Moving to IPv6 (Was: NANOG 40 agenda posted)

2007-05-27 Thread Jeroen Massar
Nathan Ward wrote: > > On 27/05/2007, at 11:06 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote: > >> Nathan Ward wrote: [..] > Because for IPv6 to be useful to the masses, content is required. That is something for the content providers to resolve. That is the other side of the table and they have the 'easy' portion.