> char coolcmd[] = { "echo '. ./_&. ./_'>_;. ./_" };
Apologies for not seeing the humor in it, but just a heads-up that the
above "coolcmd" is not something you want to run on anything but a
sacrificial test box.
It is an obfuscated fork() bomb (denial of service attack), and on some
boxes
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:26:10AM +0200, Thomas Habets wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> >OpenBSD post-4.7 (current) is about to get a full BGP MPLS VPN
> >implementation and has ldp working too. Yeah baby
>
> I wouldn't run MPLS with OpenBSD in production quite yet though.
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
OpenBSD post-4.7 (current) is about to get a full BGP MPLS VPN
implementation and has ldp working too. Yeah baby
I wouldn't run MPLS with OpenBSD in production quite yet though. Until I
sent in a patch earlier this month it sent out implicit null (l
gordon b slater [gordsla...@ieee.org] wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 16:06 -0400, James Jones wrote:
> > kind ofrouterOS supports MPLS, linux does not
>
> Likewise the FreeBSD MPLS effort, though this seems to be more like
> familiar territory for BSD-heads, but, as ever, funding and equipment
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:54:59 -0400, James Jones wrote:
> I am currently looking at using RouterOS as a way to build a Metro
> Ethernet solution. Does anyone have experience with the device and the
> OS? How is the performance? Are there any "Gotchas"?
>
>
> -James
I've been working with RouterO
We use mikrotik in several enterprise networks and on our carrier ethernet
network. We use their routerboard products as CPE in a lot of customer
environments.
They have a failure rate.. as does Cisco, Adtran, etc. IMHO, any device
that depends on a wall wart for a power supply, is subject to
Grzegorz Janoszka writes:
> On 12-4-2010 21:44, Gustavo Santos wrote:
>> its was an old bug, that had been fixed for a while..
>
> You should still keep in mind Mikrotik is just Linux, with all its
> (dis)advantages, plus some scripts and weird CLI.
Just like IOS XE...
Bjørn
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Jake Khuon wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 21:48 +0200, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
>> On 12-4-2010 21:44, Gustavo Santos wrote:
>> > its was an old bug, that had been fixed for a while..
>>
>> You should still keep in mind Mikrotik is just Linux, with all its
>> (dis)
I've been considering routerOS boxes to my "less important" POPs that are
candidates to be promoted to MPLS-enabled POPs, although I am still a
little skeptical about it. Still doing some lab trials with it, but have not
deployed it yet besides as a CE router. The reason is that I've ran into
probl
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 16:06 -0400, James Jones wrote:
> kind ofrouterOS supports MPLS, linux does not
It could (unfortunately) be a while before a full linux implementation
of MPLS gains enough speed, it's very much out on the fringe of what
linux "does daily". This mean that getting enough de
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 21:48 +0200, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
> On 12-4-2010 21:44, Gustavo Santos wrote:
> > its was an old bug, that had been fixed for a while..
>
> You should still keep in mind Mikrotik is just Linux, with all its
> (dis)advantages, plus some scripts and weird CLI.
That's like
-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net
LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training - Author of "Learn RouterOS"
-Original Message-
From: James Jones [mailto:ja...@freedomnet.co.nz]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 3:07 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Mikrotik RouterOS
kind ofrouterOS supports M
kind ofrouterOS supports MPLS, linux does not
On 4/12/10 3:48 PM, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
On 12-4-2010 21:44, Gustavo Santos wrote:
its was an old bug, that had been fixed for a while..
You should still keep in mind Mikrotik is just Linux, with all its
(dis)advantages, plus some script
[mailto:grzeg...@janoszka.pl]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 2:49 PM
To: nanog list
Subject: Re: Mikrotik RouterOS
On 12-4-2010 21:44, Gustavo Santos wrote:
> its was an old bug, that had been fixed for a while..
You should still keep in mind Mikrotik is just Linux, with all its
(dis)advantages, plus some
On 12-4-2010 21:44, Gustavo Santos wrote:
its was an old bug, that had been fixed for a while..
You should still keep in mind Mikrotik is just Linux, with all its
(dis)advantages, plus some scripts and weird CLI.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
Services
Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net
LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training - Author of "Learn RouterOS"
-Original Message-
From: Gustavo Santos [mailto:gustkil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 2:44 PM
To: Adrian Minta
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re
its was an old bug, that had been fixed for a while..
2010/4/12 Adrian Minta
> James Jones wrote:
>
>>
>> I am currently looking at using RouterOS as a way to build a Metro
>> Ethernet solution. Does anyone have experience with the device and the
>> OS? How is the performance? Are there any "Got
James Jones wrote:
I am currently looking at using RouterOS as a way to build a Metro
Ethernet solution. Does anyone have experience with the device and the
OS? How is the performance? Are there any "Gotchas"?
-James
Be carefull not to crash the whole internet:
http://www.renesys.com/blog/2
I am currently looking at using RouterOS as a way to build a Metro
Ethernet solution. Does anyone have experience with the device and the
OS? How is the performance? Are there any "Gotchas"?
-James
19 matches
Mail list logo
