On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Serge Vautour
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > We are looking to deploy a greenfield MPLS network with OSPF as the IGP.
> I'm told
> > OSPF areas don't play well with OSPF TED. For this reason, we are looki
> > We are looking to deploy a greenfield MPLS network with OSPF as the IGP.
> > I'm told
> > OSPF areas don't play well with OSPF TED. For this reason, we are looking
> > at using
>
> you said .. greenfield.. why use OSPF?
I was thinking the same. If you run OSPF and want IPv6 some time in
the
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Serge Vautour wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are looking to deploy a greenfield MPLS network with OSPF as the IGP. I'm
> told
> OSPF areas don't play well with OSPF TED. For this reason, we are looking
> at using
you said .. greenfield.. why use OSPF?
> only area 0. O
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Serge Vautour wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are looking to deploy a greenfield MPLS network with OSPF as the IGP.
> I'm told OSPF areas don't play well with OSPF TED.
Yep, OSPF-TE uses Type 10 LSAs, which only has an area flooding scope.
> For this reason, we are loo
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 08:39:40AM -0700, Serge Vautour wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are looking to deploy a greenfield MPLS network with OSPF as the
> IGP. I'm told OSPF areas don't play well with OSPF TED. For this
> reason, we are looking at?using only area 0.?Only Loopback interfaces
> and p-p core?
Hello,
We are looking to deploy a greenfield MPLS network with OSPF as the IGP. I'm
told OSPF areas don't play well with OSPF TED. For this reason, we are looking
at using only area 0. Only Loopback interfaces and p-p core ethernet links will
be in OSPF. What are the maximum number of Routers &
6 matches
Mail list logo