> I would be interested to know what your views on this are with your
vendor hat on :)
Business case conciliates resource contentions... :)
ple should they choose to implement it.
I would be interested to know what your views on this are with your vendor hat
on :)
Dave.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Tinka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 10:46 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Cc: David Fr
Hi Julien,
> > If we consider the phases in terms of IPv6 deployment,
> >
> > Ph-0: IPv4 only
> > Ph-1: IPv4/v6 dual stack + v4/v6 coexistence technologies
> > Ph-2: IPv6 only
>
> Hmm, not quite. I'd say:
>
> v4 only
> v4/v6 dual stack, with v4 being primary (for network
> management, r
On 10/11/08 17:36, Miya Kohno wrote:
>
>
> If we consider the phases in terms of IPv6 deployment,
>
> Ph-0: IPv4 only
> Ph-1: IPv4/v6 dual stack + v4/v6 coexistence technologies
> Ph-2: IPv6 only
Hmm, not quite. I'd say:
v4 only
v4/v6 dual stack, with v4 being primary (for network mana
6 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Cc: David Freedman
> Subject: Re: MPLS for IPv6
>
> On Friday 07 November 2008 17:22:33 David Freedman wrote:
>
> > So please, if you are spending your hard earned cash,
> please ask for
> > an LDP6 implementation, "no demand" s
On Friday 07 November 2008 17:22:33 David Freedman wrote:
> So please, if you are spending your hard earned cash,
> please ask for an LDP6 implementation, "no demand" should
> not be the case.
I sent our SE's at C & J yet another reminder about this.
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Well, don't know about anybody else, but I've been asking vendors for
LDP6 for a while now, every time we approach them for new projects and
they always look embarrassed when they realise that they
a. don't have it
b. are not involved in the standards process (draft-manral-mpls-ldp-ipv6-02)
So p
On 5/11/2008, at 11:36 AM, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:53:46PM -0600, devang patel wrote:
Does any vendor support the MPLS for native IPv6 network?
Unfortunately noone of the major vendors have yet implemented MPLS
control plane via IPv6 transport. From my understanding, t
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:53:46PM -0600, devang patel wrote:
> Does any vendor support the MPLS for native IPv6 network?
Unfortunately noone of the major vendors have yet implemented MPLS
control plane via IPv6 transport. From my understanding, the protocol
specs are there, just no implementation
Hi,
Its lab environment, just created one topology having few routers and
testing it for MPLS VPN for IPv6!!!
the thing is enabling MPLS on interface having IPv6 address will not bring
up LDP neighbor relationship, and due to that it will not assign the MPLS
label to the prefixes!!! so I just want
devang patel wrote:
Hi,
Does any vendor support the MPLS for native IPv6 network?
I was working on one testing scenario where I have Cisco 7200 routers and
whole network is running only IPv6 and I wanted to run MPLS on the top of
that but I found MPLS is not supported on IPv6 networks? is that t
devang patel wrote:
Hi,
Does any vendor support the MPLS for native IPv6 network?
I think the bigger question is what vendors support native IPv6 networks
and at what stage
of maturity. :)
I was working on one testing scenario where I have Cisco 7200 routers and
whole network is running
Hi,
Does any vendor support the MPLS for native IPv6 network?
I was working on one testing scenario where I have Cisco 7200 routers and
whole network is running only IPv6 and I wanted to run MPLS on the top of
that but I found MPLS is not supported on IPv6 networks? is that true?
regards
Devang P
13 matches
Mail list logo
