On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:40:45 -0800
Owen DeLong wrote:
> Setting up a proper IPv6 subnet and unique gateway for each VM is
> probably insane, but, potentially less insane than some other
> alternatives.
I second that! I give out a proper configured /64 to every "customer"
regardless of he has one,
IIRC, EDIS, at least,will give you large blocks and delegate reverse
DNS authority (+ assign your v6 block to your RIPE handle/info) if you ask.
On 11/18/2012 5:53 PM, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> Dear NANOG@,
>
> I came across an interesting problem in trying to find an affordable
> KVM p
On Nov 18, 2012, at 4:53 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012, Bryan Fields wrote:
>
>> On 11/18/12 5:53 PM, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
>>> edis.at gives you an IPv4 address of, for example, 158.255.21x.xxx,
>>> and the IPv6 /112 that you get is 2a03:f80:ed15:158:255:21x:xxx:0/112
>>>
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
> It seems insane to try to setup a proper IPv6 subnet and unique gateway for
> each VM, so I've been thinking something similar to what the host being
> complained about here has done is the only way to go. Not down to the
> detail of making the
> What's anyone really going to do with more than a few IP addresses on a VPS
>anyway?
Give every web site its own IP address, rather than using virtual
hosts, I expect.
On the other hand, I suppose if someone has more than a a few dozen web sites
on a single VPS, more likely than not something
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012, Bryan Fields wrote:
On 11/18/12 5:53 PM, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
edis.at gives you an IPv4 address of, for example, 158.255.21x.xxx,
and the IPv6 /112 that you get is 2a03:f80:ed15:158:255:21x:xxx:0/112
(really a /48), with 2a03:0f80:ed15::1 as the gateway.
By "KVM"
On 11/18/12 5:53 PM, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> edis.at gives you an IPv4 address of, for example, 158.255.21x.xxx,
> and the IPv6 /112 that you get is 2a03:f80:ed15:158:255:21x:xxx:0/112
> (really a /48), with 2a03:0f80:ed15::1 as the gateway.
Vote with your dollars and find a provider with
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
I came across an interesting problem in trying to find an affordable
KVM provider with IPv6 support.
Does "affordable" mean cheap?...
I've tried contacting them in an effort to receive any kind of a
"proper" IPv6 address without the plaintex
Hi,
> I've tried contacting them in an effort to receive any kind of a
> "proper" IPv6 address without the plaintext IPv4 embedment, but
> they've given me all sorts of crazy and (IMHO) far-sketched excuses;
> from not wanting to maintain a separate database of IPv6
> addresses/subnets, and from l
On 11/18/2012 02:53 PM, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> All I'm asking for, are sane and short addresses and/or a saner /112,
> don't really care if it's still a shared /48 underneath.
How do you define "sane," and why do you care?
Doug
Dear NANOG@,
I came across an interesting problem in trying to find an affordable
KVM provider with IPv6 support.
It seems like several rather major and reputable providers in the
value sector do claim to have IPv6 support, but once you get your IPv6
addresses or subnets from them, you might be r
11 matches
Mail list logo
