Jim Wise wrote:
> On Fri, 30 May 2008, Michael Still wrote:
>> I have seen PlanetLab experiments doing this. What are the originating
>> IP addresses?
>
> Three observed source addresses
>
> 208.78.169.237
> 204.11.51.62
> 194.199.24.101
>
> Source ports are high and non-repea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 30 May 2008, Michael Still wrote:
>Jim Wise wrote:
>> I've seen a surprising number of attempted recursive DNS requests
>> against unpublished non-recursive DNS servers in the last 24 hours or
>> so, many of them obviously probes of some sor
Jim Wise wrote:
> I've seen a surprising number of attempted recursive DNS requests
> against unpublished non-recursive DNS servers in the last 24 hours or
> so, many of them obviously probes of some sort (query for "." IN NS,
> eg).
>
> Is anyone else seeing this? Is it new? Or did some botn
I have seen this as well on my fringe IP-space networks. Just a
botnet or two running along the range. A cost of doing business :\
John Menerick
http://icehax.us
On May 30, 2008, at 10:11 AM, Lynda wrote:
Jim Wise wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've seen a surpris
Jim Wise wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've seen a surprising number of attempted recursive DNS requests
against unpublished non-recursive DNS servers in the last 24 hours or
so, many of them obviously probes of some sort (query for "." IN NS,
eg).
Is anyone else see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've seen a surprising number of attempted recursive DNS requests
against unpublished non-recursive DNS servers in the last 24 hours or
so, many of them obviously probes of some sort (query for "." IN NS,
eg).
Is anyone else seeing this? Is it new
6 matches
Mail list logo