Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport

2016-05-24 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:39:03PM +, Nevin Gonsalves wrote: > I just had to sit and trace all the cables to make sure the tx/rx > lined up for the right circuits as well as hitting the right patch > panel ports. Once all that got aligned nicely things started working > magically. Yep, ports in a

Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport

2016-05-24 Thread Mark Tinka
On 25/May/16 00:14, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > Or a very reckless oversubscription ratio and misjudgment of the customer, > example, if a provider had 2 x 100GbE capacity between two locations and > sold a customer a 100GbE EoMPLS transport circuit from A to Z, based on the > mistaken idea of "Well th

Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport

2016-05-24 Thread Eric Kuhnke
Or a very reckless oversubscription ratio and misjudgment of the customer, example, if a provider had 2 x 100GbE capacity between two locations and sold a customer a 100GbE EoMPLS transport circuit from A to Z, based on the mistaken idea of "Well these guys probably aren't going to peak more than 3

Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport

2016-05-24 Thread Mark Tinka
On 24/May/16 06:29, Rob Laidlaw wrote: > Yes. Many vendors are using l2vpn/pseudo-wire services of one sort or > another to provide circuits and most do not transport LACP by default. To the OP's case, commercially, I'd find it interesting to transport a 100Gbps circuit as EoMPLS rather than E

Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport

2016-05-24 Thread Rob Laidlaw
Yes. Many vendors are using l2vpn/pseudo-wire services of one sort or another to provide circuits and most do not transport LACP by default. LACP uses slow-protocols address: https://wiki.wireshark.org/LinkAggregationControlProtocol If they are using ALU gear, they can enable this using the port

Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport

2016-05-24 Thread Nevin Gonsalves via NANOG
Thanks all..! I just had to sit and trace all the cables to make sure the tx/rx lined up for the right circuits as well as hitting the right patch panel ports. Once all that got aligned nicely things started working magically.  thanks,-nevin On Tuesday, May 24, 2016 2:49 AM, Eygene Ryabink

Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport

2016-05-24 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Nevin, good day. Sun, May 22, 2016 at 07:55:31PM +, Nevin Gonsalves via NANOG wrote: > Hoping someone may have come across a similar issue. Has anyone ever > seen a situation where maybe like a Level3 transport system could be > possibly dropping LACP frames..? > End point A -  tx and rx count

Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport

2016-05-23 Thread Mark Tinka
On 24/May/16 08:51, Jared Mauch wrote: > I’ve seen optical transport gear be non-transparent in a few situations when > using OTU2 vs OTU2e, but they turned out to be a bug. I've seen this as well, including in an SDH transport, where OSPF packets were being eaten (something Multicast-related)

Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport

2016-05-23 Thread Jared Mauch
> On May 24, 2016, at 12:06 AM, Colton Conor wrote: > > What is performing the LACP? The Level3 transport system for the most part > is purley optical, so I don't think it touches LACP. Did you check the hash > values? I’ve seen optical transport gear be non-transparent in a few situations when

Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport

2016-05-23 Thread Colton Conor
What is performing the LACP? The Level3 transport system for the most part is purley optical, so I don't think it touches LACP. Did you check the hash values? On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Nevin Gonsalves via NANOG wrote: > Hi Nanog-ers, > Hoping someone may have come across a similar issue.

LACP Frames / Level3 Transport

2016-05-23 Thread Nevin Gonsalves via NANOG
Hi Nanog-ers, Hoping someone may have come across a similar issue. Has anyone ever seen a situation where maybe like a Level3 transport system could be possibly dropping LACP frames..? End point A -  tx and rx counts incrementing for LACP  LACP info:        Role     System             System