On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Daniel Roesen wrote:
>> > Any switch on the path?
>>
>> It is an L2 circuit that rides a couple of different pieces of gear before
>> it lands at the other side.
>
> Sounds like this equipment having problems with IPv6 multicast...
Yep, that's why I was asking -
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 11:38:44AM -0500, Randy Carpenter wrote:
> > 1) is Cisco sending NS packets?
>
> Yes.
>
> > 2) is your Juniper receiving them?
>
> It does not appear to. Tracing v6 stuff on juniper seems to be hit or miss.
[...]
> > Any switch on the path?
>
> It is an L2 circuit that r
- Original Message -
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Randy Carpenter
> wrote:
> > Tried that. I agree with others that it is an NDP issue. NDP for
> > the GUA is fine, but just not for the link local. Is there
> > something that would block only link local by default?
> >
> > I should
On Friday, December 09, 2011 08:57:39 PM Jen Linkova wrote:
> on second thought - why are they using link-local as the
> next-hop in the first place if the eBGP session is
> established over GUA?
This topic was heavily discussed on 'ipv6-ops' back in
February. You may take a look here for all th
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
> When I am trying to peer to one of my upstreams (who has cisco) with my
> Juniper SRX, They are seeing the link-local address as the next-hop, but are
> unable to get an ND entry for it, and thus cannot forward traffic to me.
on second th
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
> Tried that. I agree with others that it is an NDP issue. NDP for the GUA is
> fine, but just not for the link local. Is there something that would block
> only link local by default?
>
> I should add that I have another uplink to a differ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 7, 2011, at 4:53 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
> Tried that. I agree with others that it is an NDP issue. NDP for the GUA is
> fine, but just not for the link local. Is there something that would block
> only link local by default?
We faced a p
On 12/7/2011 6:53 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
Tried that. I agree with others that it is an NDP issue. NDP for the GUA is
fine, but just not for the link local. Is there something that would block only
link local by default?
I should add that I have another uplink to a different provider that w
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Randy Carpenter wrote:
Tried that. I agree with others that it is an NDP issue. NDP for the
GUA is fine, but just not for the link local. Is there something that
would block only link local by default?
Do you have any possibly-overly-strict firewall filters applied to the
Tried that. I agree with others that it is an NDP issue. NDP for the GUA is
fine, but just not for the link local. Is there something that would block only
link local by default?
I should add that I have another uplink to a different provider that works
perfectly. The other end is Juniper for t
On Dec 7, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Vlad Galu wrote:
> Randy Carpenter wrote:
>> Does anyone have any suggestions on setting up BGP peering between Juniper
>> (SRX) and Cisco?
>>
>> I successfully have cisco-cisco and juniper-juniper without problems.
>>
>> When I am trying to peer to one of my upstre
Try setting local-address in the bgp neighbor config on the Juniper side?
--Peter
On Dec 7, 2011, at 4:54 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
>
> Does anyone have any suggestions on setting up BGP peering between Juniper
> (SRX) and Cisco?
>
> I successfully have cisco-cisco and juniper-juniper without
In a message written on Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 04:54:13PM -0500, Randy Carpenter
wrote:
> Does anyone have any suggestions on setting up BGP peering between Juniper
> (SRX) and Cisco?
In a message written on Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 04:42:33PM -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
> Your subject is misleading. It
On 12/7/2011 4:30 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
BGP is working fine, it is when they are trying to forward the packets back to
me. They are seeing the Link-Local as the next-hop, which, for some reason,
they cannot get to.
Your subject is misleading. It appears to be an NDP problem. Check
Randy Carpenter wrote:
BGP is working fine, it is when they are trying to forward the packets back to
me. They are seeing the Link-Local as the next-hop, which, for some reason,
they cannot get to.
-Randy
Sorry Randy, I'd skimmed through your initial mail too quickly and
missed the point.
BGP is working fine, it is when they are trying to forward the packets back to
me. They are seeing the Link-Local as the next-hop, which, for some reason,
they cannot get to.
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President - IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network Group, Inc.
|
Randy Carpenter wrote:
Does anyone have any suggestions on setting up BGP peering between Juniper
(SRX) and Cisco?
I successfully have cisco-cisco and juniper-juniper without problems.
When I am trying to peer to one of my upstreams (who has cisco) with my Juniper
SRX, They are seeing the lin
We are using global addresses, but on the Cisco side, it is seeing the
Link-Local as the next-hop.
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President - IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network Group, Inc.
| (800)578-6381, Opt. 1
- Original Message -
> > When I am trying
> When I am trying to peer to one of my upstreams (who has cisco) with
> my Juniper SRX, They are seeing the link-local address as the
> next-hop
use global v6 addresses
Does anyone have any suggestions on setting up BGP peering between Juniper
(SRX) and Cisco?
I successfully have cisco-cisco and juniper-juniper without problems.
When I am trying to peer to one of my upstreams (who has cisco) with my Juniper
SRX, They are seeing the link-local address as the n
20 matches
Mail list logo
