Re: JunOS Fusion Provider Edge

2019-04-12 Thread Sander Steffann
Hi Aaron, > Can I test fusion using vMX and vQFX ? Will it work? I have tried and haven't managed to get it working. It's one of the improvements that I would like to see in vMX and vQFX. #featurerequest Cheers, Sander signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

RE: JunOS Fusion Provider Edge

2019-04-11 Thread Aaron Gould
Can I test fusion using vMX and vQFX ? Will it work? -Aaron

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: JunOS Fusion Provider Edge

2018-12-26 Thread Melchior Aelmans
acting as AD. > > I agree with those who perceive all these approaches as > proprietary lock-in (disguised as cheap). > > > > *From:* NANOG *On Behalf Of *Vincentz Petzholtz > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 19, 2018 9:01 AM > *To:* nanog > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: J

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: JunOS Fusion Provider Edge

2018-12-21 Thread Nikos Leontsinis
19, 2018 9:01 AM To: nanog Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: JunOS Fusion Provider Edge Hi there, About Juniper Fusion PE and our experience with it. For example, you can't get SNMP oids for light levels or even read them right from the CLI. Sure it’s possible but also with a big „meh“. Here i

Re: JunOS Fusion Provider Edge

2018-12-20 Thread Vincentz Petzholtz
Hi there, About Juniper Fusion PE and our experience with it. > For example, you can't get SNMP oids for light levels or even read them right > from the CLI. Sure it’s possible but also with a big „meh“. Here is how: "show interfaces diagnostics optics satellite “ (<- on the MX) BUT at least wit

Re: JunOS Fusion Provider Edge

2018-12-20 Thread Vincentz Petzholtz
Hi there, About Juniper Fusion PE and our experience with it. > For example, you can't get SNMP oids for light levels or even read them right > from the CLI. Sure it’s possible but also with a big „meh“. Here is how: "show interfaces diagnostics optics satellite “ (<- on the MX) BUT at least wit

Re: JunOS Fusion Provider Edge

2018-12-19 Thread Mehmet Akcin
thank you this is very useful to know Mehmet On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 1:46 AM James Bensley wrote: > Hi Mehmet, > > This has been discussed on the Juniper-NSP list several times, here's > a couple of examples: > > https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2018-November/036673.html > https://

Re: JunOS Fusion Provider Edge

2018-12-19 Thread James Bensley
Hi Mehmet, This has been discussed on the Juniper-NSP list several times, here's a couple of examples: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2018-November/036673.html https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2018-April/035397.html https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2016-Ju

Re: JunOS Fusion Provider Edge

2018-12-17 Thread Mark Tinka
I've, generally, always been wary about these "satellite" systems since Cisco introduced them with the ASR9000v back in 2012. My whole thing is it being a closed system that requires the same vendor hardware from start to finish. Back then, wiring things up redundantly where all ports are in actio

Re: JunOS Fusion Provider Edge

2018-12-17 Thread Matt Erculiani
Fusion has made a lot more sense since Juniper changed the licensing model from every switch AND the MX to just the MX. We've deployed it in some of our sites. It is very cool from a forwarding plane perspective, but from a control plane standpoint it's very...meh. For example, you can't get SNMP

JunOS Fusion Provider Edge

2018-12-17 Thread Mehmet Akcin
Hey there Any ISP using Juniper Fusion Provider Edge? https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/information-products/pathway-pages/junos-fusion/junos-fusion.html I am trying to chat with an engineer besides Juniper engineers to understand how buggy (or not) this is to go on production f