Re: Internet history

2021-10-27 Thread Lixia Zhang
> On Oct 21, 2021, at 12:47 PM, William Herrin wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 12:15 PM John Levine wrote: >> But it's definitely worth a visit, particularly if Len Kleinrock is around >> to give his spiel about "LO" the first message. >> >> https://uclaconnectionlab.org/internet-museum/

Re: Internet history

2021-10-21 Thread Hank Nussbacher
On 21/10/2021 21:52, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: On Oct 21, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Michael Thomas wrote: [changed to a more appropriate subject] On 10/20/21 3:52 PM, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote: On 10/20/21 3:26 PM, Michael Thomas wrote: Just as an interesting aside if you're interested in the hi

Re: Internet history

2021-10-21 Thread scott
This didn't go through.  Trying again. On 10/21/2021 2:39 PM, scott wrote: On 10/21/2021 8:52 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: It was “LO”, and Mr. Kline sent the packets, but you got it essentially right. --

Re: Internet history

2021-10-21 Thread William Herrin
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 12:15 PM John Levine wrote: > But it's definitely worth a visit, particularly if Len Kleinrock is around to > give his spiel about "LO" the first message. > > https://uclaconnectionlab.org/internet-museum/ Hi John, Is it currently possible to visit? The web page doesn't

Re: Internet history

2021-10-21 Thread John Levine
It appears that Patrick W. Gilmore said: > >My understanding is that really is IMP No. 1. Someone found it in the “to be >scrapped” pile & rescued it, then they closed off room 3420 & made it a >micro-museum. I believe the teletype >is not the original, but is a real ASR-33. The Sigma 7 is a pro

Re: Internet history

2021-10-21 Thread Michael Thomas
On 10/21/21 11:52 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: On Oct 21, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Michael Thomas wrote: [changed to a more appropriate subject] On 10/20/21 3:52 PM, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote: On 10/20/21 3:26 PM, Michael Thomas wrote: Just as an interesting aside if you're interested in the

Re: Internet history

2021-10-21 Thread Patrick W. Gilmore
On Oct 21, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Michael Thomas wrote: > > [changed to a more appropriate subject] > > On 10/20/21 3:52 PM, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote: >> On 10/20/21 3:26 PM, Michael Thomas wrote: >>> Just as an interesting aside if you're interested in the history of >>> networking, When Wizard

Internet history

2021-10-21 Thread Michael Thomas
[changed to a more appropriate subject] On 10/20/21 3:52 PM, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote: On 10/20/21 3:26 PM, Michael Thomas wrote: Just as an interesting aside if you're interested in the history of networking, When Wizards Stayed Up Late is quite elucidating. +10 to Where Wizards Stay Up

Re: Regulators now regulating Internet History? Really?

2015-06-09 Thread Larry Sheldon
On 6/8/2015 08:46, Jay Farrell via NANOG wrote: The article is nothing more or less than what you'd expect to read from the American Enterprise Institute. "All regulation totally sucks" is their only message ever. Unaddressed so far, is the appearance that the regulator quoted (without apparen

Re: Regulators now regulating Internet History? Really?

2015-06-08 Thread Livingood, Jason
On 6/8/15, 6:56 AM, "Fletcher Kittredge" mailto:fkitt...@gwi.net>> wrote: Yes, after 2005 cable companies invested in broadband... Without respect to the merits of the AEI article, I did want to point out that cable companies have been investing in broadband / Internet services well before 2005

Re: Regulators now regulating Internet History? Really?

2015-06-08 Thread Jay Farrell via NANOG
t; wrote: > > > Looks to me that there are issues of interest here. > > > > > > > http://www.aei.org/publication/tom-wheeler-tries-to-rewrite-internet-history/ > > > This isn't a very good article. > > At best, it is a set of unsubstantiated claims r

Re: Regulators now regulating Internet History? Really?

2015-06-08 Thread Fletcher Kittredge
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 6:01 AM, Larry Sheldon wrote: > Looks to me that there are issues of interest here. > > > http://www.aei.org/publication/tom-wheeler-tries-to-rewrite-internet-history/ This isn't a very good article. At best, it is a set of unsubstantiated claims re

Regulators now regulating Internet History? Really?

2015-06-08 Thread Larry Sheldon
Looks to me that there are issues of interest here. http://www.aei.org/publication/tom-wheeler-tries-to-rewrite-internet-history/ -- sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)