McBride, Mack
Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 11:34 AM
To: Kasper Adel
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: RE: Intel DPDK vs Broadcom/Mellanox SDK
The Broadcom chips have some quirks that the Broadcom SDK handles and the DPDK
does not.
Specifically related around port hang up after port flaps.
I am certain
n...@nanog.org>] On
Behalf Of Kasper Adel
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2018 11:45 PM
To: NANOG list mailto:nanog@nanog.org>>
Subject: Intel DPDK vs Broadcom/Mellanox SDK
Hi
Anothe email thread to get some guidance on points to consider when comparing
new platforms that advocate using DPDK as the
half Of Kasper Adel
> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2018 11:45 PM
> To: NANOG list
> Subject: Intel DPDK vs Broadcom/Mellanox SDK
>
> Hi
>
> Anothe email thread to get some guidance on points to consider when
> comparing new platforms that advocate using DPDK as the hardware
> ac
ilto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Kasper Adel
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2018 11:45 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Intel DPDK vs Broadcom/Mellanox SDK
Hi
Anothe email thread to get some guidance on points to consider when comparing
new platforms that advocate using DPDK as the hardware accelerat
Hi
Anothe email thread to get some guidance on points to consider when
comparing new platforms that advocate using DPDK as the hardware
acceleration SDK vs the broadcom/mellanox.
The DPDK ones claim enhanced performance but every time i ask questions, i
get the logical and typical answer of “it d
5 matches
Mail list logo