> I guess as a follow up question. Do you use the EUI-64 address as the
> Default gateway or the link local.
>> rfc 6164
what's link local? does it do vrrp? :)
randy
I guess as a follow up question. Do you use the EUI-64 address as the Default
gateway or the link local.
On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 2:19 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
rfc 6164
rfc 6164
If only there was a best practices doc to help here... Oh wait there is!
http://bcop.nanog.org/index.php/IPv6_Subnetting
It doesn't specifically mention BGP so as to be protocol agnostic but
does recommend allocating a /64 and using a /126 or /127.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Philip Lav
There are tradeoffs in both directions.
Personally I think administrative simplicity wins over security through
obscurity, so I recommend each organization pick a random pair of static
addresses and use those two addresses for all of their point to point links.
e.g. If your prefix for a given l
ineering
Grande Communications
512.878.5627
-Original Message-
From: Justin M. Streiner [mailto:strei...@cluebyfour.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 8:44 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Fw: ipv6 newbie question
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 29/01/2014 17:35, Philip L
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 29/01/2014 17:35, Philip Lavine wrote:
Is it best practice to have the internet facing BGP router's peering ip
(or for that matter any key gateway or security appliance) use a
statically configured address or use EUI-64 auto config?
how are you goi
Hi,
> Is it best practice to have the internet facing BGP router's peering ip (or
> for that matter any key gateway or security appliance) use a statically
> configured address or use EUI-64 auto config?
>
> I have seen comments on both sides and am leaning to EUI-64 (except for the
> VIP's li
On 29/01/2014 17:35, Philip Lavine wrote:
> Is it best practice to have the internet facing BGP router's peering ip
> (or for that matter any key gateway or security appliance) use a
> statically configured address or use EUI-64 auto config?
how are you going to set up the bgp session from the rem
On Jan 29, 2014, at 12:35 PM, Philip Lavine wrote:
> Is it best practice to have the internet facing BGP router's peering ip (or
> for that matter any key gateway or security appliance) use a statically
> configured address or use EUI-64 auto config?
>
> I have seen comments on both sides a
Is it best practice to have the internet facing BGP router's peering ip (or for
that matter any key gateway or security appliance) use a statically configured
address or use EUI-64 auto config?
I have seen comments on both sides and am leaning to EUI-64 (except for the
VIP's like the ASA'
>
> > > I'm sure someone here is doing IPv6 peering with cogent. We've got a
> > > Gig
> [SNIP]
> > We have separate v4 and v6 sessions with them on the same dual-stack
> > interface (a v4 /29 and v6 /112 on the interface). One session is
> >
On Tuesday 06 April 2010 08:10:14 pm Ricky Beam wrote:
> That's the equiv of a /31 in IPv4. Do you use /31's for p-t-p links in
> your IPv4 network(s)?
Yes, like many others (there was a thread on this on NANOG towards the end of
January, no? Yes; started 1/22/2010 by Seth Mattinen; I don't have
Ricky Beam wrote (on Apr 06):
> On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 03:20:26 -0400, shake righa wrote:
> >Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
>
> That's the equiv of a /31 in IPv4. Do you use /31's for p-t-p links
> in your IPv4 network(s)?
>
> (Yes, I've used /31's before, but only
> > You don't have to disable it. "Small, unknown" vendors like Cisco and
> > Juniper
>
> I don't think you're correct.
> > have IPv6 ND disabled on point to point links, and (at least
> > for Juniper) there is no option to turn it on.
I encourage people to verify this for themselves.
Steinar
>> Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
> That's the equiv of a /31 in IPv4. Do you use /31's for p-t-p links in
> your IPv4 network(s)?
of course
randy
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 03:20:26 -0400, shake righa wrote:
Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
That's the equiv of a /31 in IPv4. Do you use /31's for p-t-p links in
your IPv4 network(s)?
(Yes, I've used /31's before, but only to represent 2 /32's. And even
that
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:54:17 +0200 (CEST)
sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
> > > > > Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
> > > >
> > > > The best advice is to use a /64 unless you have read and understood
> > > > RFC 3627 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3627
> > >
> > > RFC 3627
> > > > Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
> > >
> > > The best advice is to use a /64 unless you have read and understood
> > > RFC 3627 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3627
> >
> > RFC 3627 *and* the following Internet draft:
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/search/d
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:57:41 +0200 (CEST)
sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
> > > Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
> >
> > The best advice is to use a /64 unless you have read and understood
> > RFC 3627 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3627
>
> RFC 3627 *and* the following Int
On 04/06/10 09:20, shake righa wrote:
> Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
>
There was a recent thread here on this topic, see
http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg04500.html
Lorand Jakab
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> > Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
>
> The best advice is to use a /64 unless you have read and understood
> RFC 3627 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3627
RFC 3627 *and* the following Internet draft:
http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-01
Thanks
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Michael Dillon
wrote:
> > different documentation state that clients be given /64 with ISP's beign
> > given /48 from assigned global /32.
>
> That should be that ISPs are given a global /32 from which they
> assign /48s to clients. The client would assign
> different documentation state that clients be given /64 with ISP's beign
> given /48 from assigned global /32.
That should be that ISPs are given a global /32 from which they
assign /48s to clients. The client would assign a /64 to each LAN segment.
> Can one subnet to include /127 for point to
I have several queries in regards to ipv6
different documentation state that clients be given /64 with ISP's beign
given /48 from assigned global /32.
Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
Is there any newbie guide for ipv6 subnetting?
Regards,
Shake
25 matches
Mail list logo
