On Sep 24, 2012, at 21:08 , Jeff Wheeler wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:52 PM, John Mitchell wrote:
>> Does the best practise switch to now using one IPv6 per site, or still the
>> same one IPv6 for multi-sites?
>
> Certainly it would be nice to have IPv6 address per vhost. In many
> case
Morning,
The way to allocate IPv6 addresses per website depends more on the
technologies already in use at the hosting site. An existing hoster will
move slowly to any alternative method.
I predict a bigger, faster change in the way medium sized sites do load
balancing. IPv6 allows hosters t
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:52 PM, John Mitchell wrote:
> Does the best practise switch to now using one IPv6 per site, or still the
> same one IPv6 for multi-sites?
Certainly it would be nice to have IPv6 address per vhost. In many
cases, this will be practical.
It also sometimes will NOT be pra
William Herrin wrote:
>
> but I also can't imagine hosting more than 65,000 sites on a single
> server.
Demon's homepages service was based on IPv4 virtual hosting and had IIRC a
/16 and two /18s allocated to it. It was a single web server with a few
reverse proxies that took most of the load and
>Does the best practise switch to now using one IPv6 per site, or still
>the same one IPv6 for multi-sites?
As I've been migrating my sites to IPv6, each site gets its own IP.
Works great. I did find that I needed to improve my tools so I could
track the individual IP addresses and assign the ap
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:52 PM, John Mitchell wrote:
> Question about what other service/network providers are doing in relation to
> allocation of addresses for websites.
>
> With IPv6 starting to trickle its way in, what is considered the industry
> best practise now for IP(v6) addresses bonded
Question about what other service/network providers are doing in
relation to allocation of addresses for websites.
With IPv6 starting to trickle its way in, what is considered the
industry best practise now for IP(v6) addresses bonded to websites. In
the past the standard practise was to have
7 matches
Mail list logo