Sounds great Jay, thanks!
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Jay Moran wrote:
> I have BCC'd the likely appropriate Hilton contact for you on this
> response so they can take a look at the NANOG emails below regarding their
> Internet proxies to see if it looks like something they can assist with.
I have BCC'd the likely appropriate Hilton contact for you on this response
so they can take a look at the NANOG emails below regarding their Internet
proxies to see if it looks like something they can assist with. They were
able to have some MTA issues corrected last time Hilton came up on the
NAN
Better yet, does anyone have any Hilton contacts they could pass my info to?
-Grant
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Grant Ridder wrote:
> Anyone from Hilton out there? We are still having this issue. It is not
> a wayport address since I looked and they are not registered under Hilton's
> nam
Anyone from Hilton out there? We are still having this issue. It is not a
wayport address since I looked and they are not registered under Hilton's
name.
-Grant
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Grant Ridder wrote:
> The requests are coming from 167.187.100.202 which is in a /16 assigned to
> H
The requests are coming from 167.187.100.202 which is in a /16 assigned to
Hilton. As far as i know, the waypoint service has its own netblocks.
-Grant
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> On Jul 16, 2013, at 3:44 PM, Grant Ridder wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Anyone from Hilton
On Jul 16, 2013, at 3:44 PM, Grant Ridder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anyone from Hilton Hotels NOC or related on here? We are seeing their
> internet proxy doing weird things to http requests to servers at $DAYJOB.
Many of the hilton properties have migrated to Wayport/"attwifi". Are you
seeing the
Hi,
Anyone from Hilton Hotels NOC or related on here? We are seeing their
internet proxy doing weird things to http requests to servers at $DAYJOB.
-Grant
7 matches
Mail list logo
