* ja...@puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch) [Thu 30 Apr 2020, 20:10 CEST]:
(Waits for others to crawl out of the woodwork who were more involved in this
:-)
Half duplex 10baseT ports, man. The collision LEDs never calmed down.
-- Niels.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:43 AM Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 2:39 PM Aaron C. de Bruyn
> wrote:
> >
> > Why isn't there a well-known anycast ping address similar to
> CloudFlare/Google/Level 3 DNS, or sorta like the NTP project?
> > Get someone to carve out some well-know
On 4/30/20 11:38 AM, Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG wrote:
Why isn't there a well-known anycast ping address similar to
CloudFlare/Google/Level 3 DNS, or sorta like the NTP project?
Get someone to carve out some well-known IP and allow every ISP on the
planet to add that IP to a router or BSD box s
> On Apr 30, 2020, at 2:41 PM, Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
>
> It sounds like, to me anyway, you'd like to copy/paste/sed the AS112
> project's goals, no?
I just use this page:
http://hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/
- jared
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 2:39 PM Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
>
> Why isn't there a well-known anycast ping address similar to
> CloudFlare/Google/Level 3 DNS, or sorta like the NTP project?
> Get someone to carve out some well-known IP and allow every ISP on the planet
> to add that IP to a router o
Why isn't there a well-known anycast ping address similar to
CloudFlare/Google/Level 3 DNS, or sorta like the NTP project?
Get someone to carve out some well-known IP and allow every ISP on the
planet to add that IP to a router or BSD box somewhere on their network?
Allow product manufacturers to t
Jared Mauch wrote on 30/04/2020 19:09:
This is why the majority of traffic volume for interconnection has
generally been over private peering links (paid, SFI, otherwise).
ixps have always been a mid-market phenomenon. They don't deal with the
high volume data flows because it never made financ
> On Apr 29, 2020, at 7:59 PM, Kaiser, Erich wrote:
>
> So it has been 3 weeks of major ICMP packet loss to any google service over
> the Dallas Equinix IX, it is not affecting performance of service but is
> affecting us with customer complaints and service calls due to some software
> usi
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 20:11, William Allen Simpson
wrote:
> Tried to get the FTC interested, no joy. Congress made noises
> about passing a law requiring software updates (especially for
> security issues), but still nothing on that either.
This is not practical or reasonable. Companies may no
On 4/29/20 8:53 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
I suppose it's time for a more public:
"Hey, when you want to test a service, please take the time to test
that service on it's service port/protocol"
Testing; "Is the internet up?"
by pinging a DNS server, is ... not great ;(
I get that telling '
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 8:00 PM Kaiser, Erich wrote:
>
> So it has been 3 weeks of major ICMP packet loss to any google service over
> the Dallas Equinix IX, it is not affecting performance of service but is
> affecting us with customer complaints and service calls due to some software
> using
So it has been 3 weeks of major ICMP packet loss to any google service over
the Dallas Equinix IX, it is not affecting performance of service but is
affecting us with customer complaints and service calls due to some
software using it for monitoring purposes people using it for benchmark
testing.
12 matches
Mail list logo
