On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 11:44:28AM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On 1 Apr 2009, at 11:19, TJ wrote:
>
> >You do not (or, atleast I do not :)) have the option of connecting
> >to Google "over" MPLS, Ethernet, etc.
>
> r1.owls#show arp | inc 198.32.245.6
> Internet 198.32.245.62 001
ike to get them. (/southpark)
>-Original Message-
>From: Joe Abley [mailto:jab...@hopcount.ca]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:44 AM
>To: TJ
>Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>Subject: Re: Google Over IPV6
>
>
>On 1 Apr 2009, at 11:19, TJ wrote:
>
>> You do not (o
On 1 Apr 2009, at 11:19, TJ wrote:
You do not (or, atleast I do not :)) have the option of connecting
to Google "over" MPLS, Ethernet, etc.
r1.owls#show arp | inc 198.32.245.6
Internet 198.32.245.62 001f.128e.56f2 ARPA
FastEthernet0/1
r1.owls#show ipv6 neighbors | inc 20
>>> AFAIK you have to have native peering with them to be part of the
>>> pilot. At least, you did when we signed up. They may have relaxed
>>> that since.
>>
>> According to a Google IPv6 talk I attended yesterday, they don't
>> intend to relax that rule. Tunneling ipv6 connectivity over ipv4 i
Everything is a tunnel...
Tube man. Everything is a tube... and Al Gore invented tubes.
MMC
Nick
--
Matthew Moyle-Croft Internode/Agile Peering and Core Networks
Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 27/03/2009 15:26, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>> AFAIK you have to have native peering with them to be part of the
>> pilot. At least, you did when we signed up. They may have relaxed
>> that since.
>
> According to a Google IPv6 talk I attended yesterday, they don't intend
> t
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 11:03 -0400, Robert D. Scott wrote:
> Their press would indicate that more than www is IPV6.
>
> When I posted my original note, I was not really looking for end user
> feedback, but rather is anyone peering V6 with them on either a public
> fabric or private peer. Any idea
Athanasios Douitsis wrote:
> Heard that they are somewhat picky about who they -enable. Our campus
> has had native IPv6 everywhere and upwards all the way to Geant for many
> years. We are thinking of applying in the hopes that it will boost IPv6
> usage. Did you have any trouble getting th
eer. Any idea if they have native V6
> > transit, or are tunneling, and to where.
>
> Google seems to aim at Tier 1 status for IPv6. No transit, no
> tunneling.
>
>From their web page at http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/:
"To qualify for Google over IPv6, your network
On 27/03/2009, at 11:20 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Google seems to aim at Tier 1 status for IPv6. No transit, no
tunneling.
That seems to be the case, yep. It's an interesting plan.
On 27/03/2009, at 8:03 AM, Robert D. Scott wrote:
Their press would indicate that more than www is IPV6.
Y
* Robert D. Scott:
> When I posted my original note, I was not really looking for end
> user feedback, but rather is anyone peering V6 with them on either a
> public fabric or private peer. Any idea if they have native V6
> transit, or are tunneling, and to where.
Google seems to aim at Tier 1 st
>>
> >> ipv6.google.com looks better to me than the IPv4 version does.
> >> More comfort. It is worth the trouble with teredo.
> >
> > Um, are you sure you are using Google over IPv6?
> >
> > This is *not the same thing* as ipv6.google.com.
> >
t; ipv6.google.com looks better to me than the IPv4 version does.
> >> More comfort. It is worth the trouble with teredo.
> >
> > Um, are you sure you are using Google over IPv6?
> >
> > This is *not the same thing* as ipv6.google.com.
> >
> > Google o
is worth the trouble with teredo.
>
> Um, are you sure you are using Google over IPv6?
>
> This is *not the same thing* as ipv6.google.com.
>
> Google over IPv6 is about accessing www.google.com via IPv6. For you to
> be doing this, you must have IPv6 connectivity and your IPv6 netw
Robert D. Scott wrote:
http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/032509-google-ipv6-easy.html
It's relatively easy to make _your own_ apps (i.e. ones you have the
source for) support IPv6.
Most companies, though, are completely reliant on their vendors, wh
Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:46:50 +0100
Daniel Verlouw wrote:
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 09:34 -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
It's working for me, too, though I noticed that tcptraceroute (at
least the version I have) doesn't do well with ipv6.google.com.
seems to work fi
On 27/03/2009 15:26, Leo Bicknell wrote:
AFAIK you have to have native peering with them to be part of the
pilot. At least, you did when we signed up. They may have relaxed
that since.
According to a Google IPv6 talk I attended yesterday, they don't intend to
relax that rule. Tunneling ipv6
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Daniel Verlouw wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 08:18 -0400, Robert D. Scott wrote:
> > Any one making use of Google IPV6?
>
> yes. We participate in the Google IPv6 trial program so our recursors
> get records for www.google.com and so far it's been great, no
In a message written on Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:03:05AM -0400, Robert D. Scott
wrote:
> When I posted my original note, I was not really looking for end user
> feedback, but rather is anyone peering V6 with them on either a public
> fabric or private peer. Any idea if they have native V6 transit,
> When I posted my original note, I was not really looking for end user
> feedback, but rather is anyone peering V6 with them on either a public
> fabric or private peer. Any idea if they have native V6 transit, or are
> tunneling, and to where.
They are peering over some IXPs and private peerings
Robert D. Scott wrote:
When I posted my original note, I was not really looking for end user
feedback, but rather is anyone peering V6 with them on either a public
fabric or private peer. Any idea if they have native V6 transit, or are
tunneling, and to where.
No tuneling I think. We have with
-0421 Cell
-Original Message-
From: Grzegorz Janoszka [mailto:grzeg...@janoszka.pl]
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 10:55 AM
To: Daniel Verlouw
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Google Over IPV6
Daniel Verlouw wrote:
> yes. We participate in the Google IPv6 trial program so our recursors
&g
Daniel Verlouw wrote:
yes. We participate in the Google IPv6 trial program so our recursors
get records for www.google.com and so far it's been great, no
issues whatsoever.
Same experiences - it just works.
dan...@jun1> traceroute www.google.com
traceroute6 to www.l.google.com (2001:4
In a message written on Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 08:18:50AM -0400, Robert D. Scott
wrote:
> Any one making use of Google IPV6?
We are in the trial:
% traceroute6 -n www.google.com
traceroute6 to www.l.google.com (2001:4860:b002::68) from
2001:4f8:3:bb::5, 64 hops max, 12 byte packets
1 2001:4f8:3:
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:46:50 +0100
Daniel Verlouw wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 09:34 -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> > It's working for me, too, though I noticed that tcptraceroute (at
> > least the version I have) doesn't do well with ipv6.google.com.
>
> seems to work fine from over here:
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 09:34 -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> It's working for me, too, though I noticed that tcptraceroute (at least
> the version I have) doesn't do well with ipv6.google.com.
seems to work fine from over here:
# tcptraceroute6 www.google.com 80
traceroute to www.google.com (20
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:20:26 +1100
Shaun Ewing wrote:
>
> On 27/03/09 11:59 PM, "Daniel Verlouw" wrote:
>
> > yes. We participate in the Google IPv6 trial program so our
> > recursors get records for www.google.com and so far it's been
> > great, no issues whatsoever.
>
> Same.
>
> We'v
On 27/03/09 11:59 PM, "Daniel Verlouw" wrote:
> yes. We participate in the Google IPv6 trial program so our recursors
> get records for www.google.com and so far it's been great, no
> issues whatsoever.
Same.
We've been participating since January and haven't had any problems:
# tracerou
e you are using Google over IPv6?
This is *not the same thing* as ipv6.google.com.
Google over IPv6 is about accessing www.google.com via IPv6. For you to
be doing this, you must have IPv6 connectivity and your IPv6 network
must meet Google's fairly stringent requi
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 08:18 -0400, Robert D. Scott wrote:
> Any one making use of Google IPV6?
yes. We participate in the Google IPv6 trial program so our recursors
get records for www.google.com and so far it's been great, no
issues whatsoever.
dan...@jun1> traceroute www.google.com
tra
yup... and it is nice, adwords don't work pretty well (or at least on the GeoIP
thingie), and i get less publicity to look at :-)
---
Nuno Vieira
nfsi telecom, lda.
nuno.vie...@nfsi.pt
Tel. (+351) 21 949 2300 - Fax (+351) 21 949 2301
http://www.nfsi.pt/
- "Robert D. Scott" wrote:
> http
Robert D. Scott wrote:
> http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/
>
> http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/032509-google-ipv6-easy.html
>
> Any one making use of Google IPV6?
It's been my Firefox home page ever since it was available.
Steve
Yes I do.
I can use it but sometimes got trouble with teredo.
Retry half an hour later works :)
ipv6.google.com looks better to me than the IPv4 version does.
More comfort. It is worth the trouble with teredo.
Peter
Robert D. Scott wrote:
> http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/
>
> http://www.n
http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/032509-google-ipv6-easy.html
Any one making use of Google IPV6?
Robert D. Scott rob...@ufl.edu
Senior Network Engineer 352-273-0113 Phone
CNS - Network Services 352-392-2061 CNS Phone Tree
34 matches
Mail list logo
